| |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Chris Dee wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Michael Heidemann wrote:
> > > Tore Eriksson wrote:
> > > > Looks like I have lost my priviliges to submit parts to the Tracker...
> > > > Could somebody please submit this before the part number is taken by somebody
> > > > else.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > /Tore
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 0 Brick 1 x 6 without Center Studs with black STORE Pattern
> > > > 0 Name: 3067pt3.dat
> > > > 0 Author: Tore Eriksson
> > > > 0 Unofficial Part
> > > > 0 BFC CERTIFY CW
> > > >
> > > > 0 REM Line Thickness: 2.1 LDU
> > > > 0 REM Y-range: 4.4 - 17.0
> > > >
> > > > 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s/3067s01.dat 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\3067s01.dat
> > > > 1 16 -20 4 0 0 0 1 0 12 0 6 0 0 box3u2p.dat
> > > > 1 16 20 4 0 0 0 1 0 12 0 6 0 0 box3u2p.dat
> > >
> > > Hi Tore,
> > >
> > > I just uploaded your file to the parts tracker.
> > > I had to adjust the entry for the subfile (slash converted to backslash)
> > >
> > > Michael Heidemann
> > > (mikeheide)
> >
> > Hold on there !
> >
> > The reason that Tore does not currently have submit privileges is that we are
> > waiting for his affirmation of the Contributor Agreement.
> > http://www.ldraw.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=350&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
> >
> > As of the date of this announcement, everyone's submission rights were revoked
> > and only re-instated on receipt of an affirmation.
> >
> > If you submit a part in Tore's name then we no longer know whether new
> > submissions are covered by the CA or not. Effectively we now see this as
> > submitted by you (but using Tore's name as author). That looks bad to me.
> >
> > I have put this on hold until this is resolved - ideally until Tore can upload
> > himself.
> >
> > Chris
>
> Oh dear. Then write the agreement in a little easier English so we have a chance
> to know what we sign. What is that agreement good for anyway? Is it something
> the Jessiman's wanted?
What exactly is hard to understand. We tried to write the CA as clearly as
possible without being ambiguous. Chris or I (or any other SteerCo member)
would be more than happy to explain whatever part is confusing to you to your
satisfaction.
> And the security demands for passwords are way higher than my banks have.
> Sometimes I get very dark feelings...
I don't understand what you are refering to here.
-Orion
FUT to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Contributor's Agreement (Was: New Part...)
|
| (...) For example: "The right to create derivative works of the Work" Does that mean altering the works (in this case: editing my dat files and make updates on them) without trying to contact me first? Or does it just mean works that uses my works? (...) (19 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Contributor's Agreement (Was: New Part...)
|
| (...) Oh dear. Then write the agreement in a little easier English so we have a chance to know what we sign. What is that agreement good for anyway? Is it something the Jessiman's wanted? And the security demands for passwords are way higher than my (...) (19 years ago, 30-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
