 | | Re: New Part: x716.dat - 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring
|
|
(...) I think so. I don't actually have these parts, but I was just looking at some last Saturday. Here's a comparison pic (URL) TWS Garrison (URL) capital letters in address for direct reply. (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New (well...) Part: x717.dat - Brick 2 x 14 with Groove
|
|
(...) Wow, you weren't kidding about old. I assume the studs don't have logos on the real one, since you went so far as to avoid using the stud primitive. I've never seen the part, so the only comment I have isn't related to the geometry. Any (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x716.dat - 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring
|
|
(...) Thanks! Well, it took some hours to make. (...) Oh. I didn't know there was a variant without cutouts. Do they look exactly the same apart from the cutouts? /Tore (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New (well...) Part: x717.dat - Brick 2 x 14 with Groove [DAT]
|
|
Now we're talking *old* LEGO! 8-) 0 Brick 2 x 14 with Groove 0 Name: x717.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unufficial Part 0 BFC CERTIFY CCW 0 KEYWORDS vintage 4 16 140 24 20 136 24 16 -136 24 16 -140 24 20 4 16 -140 24 20 -136 24 16 -136 24 -16 -140 (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: x716.dat - 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring
|
|
(...) Looks nice. (...) 'Brick 2 x 4 Half Round with Cutouts' would fit in with 3063, 2577, and 30357. Alternatively, "Round Brick 4 x 4 Half with Cutouts" or "Round Brick 2 x 4 Half with Cutouts" (depending on how you look at it) could get the (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: x716.dat - 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring [DAT]
|
|
At last, I lay my greedy hands on one of this rare, vintage macarony variant! I just had to LDraw it at once... A better name, anyone? 0 Brick 2 x 4 x 1 Ring 0 Name: x716.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Part 0 KEYWORDS macaroni, round, (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(URL) anyone have *any* feedback on these ideas? Orion? Please let me know (even in a private e-mail if you want) if you think these are viable alternatives or if they're totally not worth considering! I'd appreciate any comment! Thanks, --Ryan (URL) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) I think this is a moot point, but... The rule could be written so that a contributor must allow/license their work for publication on the contest website, for people to view/examine in relation to the contest, but not for further (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Need partnumbers and some partnames
|
|
(...) I think putting Motor Cutout in the keywords would work, if we can't reasonably fit it in the part title. (...) OK, I think Stop and Proceed are OK for the names. (...) So the light bulb can be physically removed from the complete part? But (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LGEO Problem in POV-Ray
|
|
(...) The error occurs with this code from the your file: #if (QUAL > 0) #declare _4319_dot_dat_slope = object { // Hinge Bar 8 with Split Rod Holder lg_4319_slope matrix <0,0,-20/LG_BRICK_WIDTH, -20/LG_BRICK_WIDTH,0,0, 0,-24/LG_BRICK_HEIGHT,0, (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | LGEO Problem in POV-Ray
|
|
Hi, I've just been getting familiar will LCad & POV-Ray the past few days and things have been moving along fine but recently I've run into a problem with a certain model/piece. In using the LGEO library's I get a lot of undeclared identifier's when (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Show 3d lego models in the web
|
|
Nice job. About the active x thing, I managed to gain access to your page by going into into Tools-Internet Options-Security-Custom Level and then scrolling down to active x and making everything on 'prompt'. Now when I go to your page, a few (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub/LSynth/Mega-POV Question
|
|
(...) Bingo! There's my problem: not enought constraints. I have been using very few constraints to make my wires, because I thought they turned out better that way - boy was I wrong! Thanks a million for the tip! David J. Perdue (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: *** LDView Version 2.1 Released ***
|
|
(...) UUUUUPS!!! big, huge, enormous, gigantic typo! what I tried to say was "-SaveSnapshot=C:\......bmp(png)" BTW setting the quotes blanks work also fine in the path name. there are no problems with a command like this: "-SaveSnapshot=C:\My (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) Here's the correct link: (URL) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) Are they available on the net? According to the Wayback Machine (URL) were once at (URL) but that link is dead now. Don (21 years ago, 7-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: *** LDView Version 2.1 Released ***
|
|
I just discovered that I forgot to put the following in the change history for LDView 2.1 (it's there now in the on-line version of the change history): Added ability to screen saver to select a directory and have a random model from that directory (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub/LSynth/Mega-POV Question
|
|
In lugnet.cad.ray, David Perdue wrote: David, This problem is tops of the list of things to fix. Kevin (21 years ago, 7-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub/LSynth/Mega-POV Question
|
|
(...) Larry is right. The cross sections are not overlapping as they are supposed to. This can happen if the wire is bent too hard, or the constraints are too far apart. LPub uses a large fixed size array when synthesizing between any two (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub/LSynth/Mega-POV Question
|
|
(...) This is actually an lsynth problem. Try using more constraints so it packs the segments between the two constraints more densly. Kevin (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
