 | | Re: *** LDView Version 2.1 Released ***
|
|
(...) I went and looked, and found a couple of things. On video cards with good OpenGL support, it only loads the model once, but it compiles the model twice. I'll have this fixed in the next version. (You can tell if you have one of these video (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) But not allowing it discriminates against larger or more detailed entries. Take a look at the December models. There's no way to see all the details of two of the models without the LDR file. You're just leveling the field in your favor (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) I am not so keen on it, it sort of smacks of potential discrimination against entries that choose not to do so. If we are going for a level playing field let's get completely level. (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) Well that wasn't just me. Steve and I had discussed it for some time and had wanted to move in that direction. The change actually got a bit of help from Michael Lachmann who asked, and Steve and I gave a thumbs up, then others followed suit. (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: *** LDView Version 2.1 Released ***
|
|
(...) You're welcome. As an aside to other users that have feature ideas, I believe that Willy suggested/requested all of the above. I tend to be fairly arbitrary about which feature requests get implemented and which ones don't (I'm more likely to (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: *** LDView Version 2.1 Released ***
|
|
(...) I have no problem doing this. Not sure how big the file will be at the moment, since I can't access the repository from work, but I don't mind creating a tgz of the actual repository. I assume by your request that you know how to add the (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
--snip-- (...) Not completely true. Orion's original post was to get ideas/feedback on his proposed changes. In the end it will be up to him to decide how he sets up the MOTM rules. Why? Simple, this decision is not up to a committee! Case in point (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) How do you feel about requiring the LDR file in order to generate standardized pics, but keeping the publishing of the LDR file itself optional? Would that also prevent you from submitting? (...) I don't buy that analogy. It's not your (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: *** LDView Version 2.1 Released ***
|
|
(...) Hmm, this might just be the excuse I needed to learn a bit about QT. No promises though, I'm easily distracted... (...) What about a tarball or zip file of the LDView portions of your CVS repository? I use a nightly script on the sourceforge (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: *** LDView Version 2.1 Released ***
|
|
(...) Sure. That would be spectacular. For the most part, all the Linux-specific stuff is in the QT directory (I try to keep all the common code cross-platform, but I'm sure there are problems caused by me not actually having compiled in Linux (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
