 | | Re: Lpub 2.1.0.4 problems
|
|
(...) Not using POV 3.5. If I do something (combination I'm not sure) it shows up after I jump around the menus for a while. (...) Only running one instance for sure. I actually restarted and went straight to Lpub. I did try rendering one of the (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.inst, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives)
|
|
(...) I'd have to look at the code again, but there's no reason why it couldn't deal with anything :) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about the Future of LDraw CAD family.
|
|
Hi Dwayne - (...) No reason that I see, in fact, it just hasn't happened yet :-) (...) Yup. (...) Absolutely. (...) It's funny how with this post you've hit the nail on the head with my current line of thinking. :-) Steve and I have been talking (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about the Future of LDraw CAD family.
|
|
(...) Ok, got an even more general question. Any reason that a group, could be set aside to develop just the CAD engine, and allow it to be used for loads of things? I mean, the core engine programmers could develop the core parts of the program, (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: What's up with box3#8.dat? (was: BFC parts with BFC-less primitives)
|
|
(...) HTML can handle anything. So can HTTP, but of the characters listed above, I think it is only '-' and '_' which don't need special treatment. The next level of problems is that the parts tracker is implemented in Perl and running on a Unix (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Windows: How many versions? Please respond!
|
|
(...) That's looking from the manufacturer's point of wiev. I prefer to look at LDrawing from the builder's. When there are TLG part numbers available, of course they should be used. But I see no point wasting 3-digit numbers in vain. (...) Maybe I (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Windows: How many versions? Please respond!
|
|
Niels: (...) Tore: (...) I don't know about a real glassless version of the 7930 door, but I noticed when rendering the 368 taxi house that the 7930 door did not have glass. The current official LDraw part 7930.dat has no glass! Since I have only (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Windows: How many versions? Please respond!
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) You're right. I thought that the 'a' version was the version most likely to be used, but now, looking at tiles and 1x1 round bricks, I noticed that my theory fell. (...) Oh no, so the 7930 door also exists in a without-glass (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: lsynth - LDRAW compatible bendable part synthesizer available
|
|
Hi Kevin! I cannot seem to get LSynth to work. The only thing it generates is the same file as the input file... What do I do wrong? Jaco (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Glut fixes and Offscreen Rendering
|
|
(...) No problem. So what about the offscreen rendering? Does it work? (URL) render offscreen you use -MS on the ldglite command line, eg. ldglite -v3 -l3 -i1 -MS mymodel.mpd (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: LPub 2.1.0.3 released
|
|
Bill, Give it a try. I'm still working on the version that has auto-centering, but it will be out soon. The problem only shows up sometimes. Kevin (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.inst)
|
| |
| | Re: Classic Windows: How many versions? Please respond!
|
|
(...) Are the long ledge versions older than the short ledge versions? Why not have the oldest version 'a' and the newer version 'b', etc. The window frame and the glass are actually two seperate parts, glued together. When making the glassed (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Classic Windows: How many versions? Please respond!
|
|
If you look closely at Classic Windows, you'll find that there are diffeences in many details. See (URL) for the details I have found. See suggested 27a.dat, 27b.dat, and 27c.dat (recently posted). The oldest windows I have, have solid studs and (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | [Suggest New Part]: 27c.dat - Window Classic 1 x 2 x 1 without Glass [DAT]
|
|
(I suggest 27.dat be moved to 27c.dat) 0 Window Classic 1 x 2 x 1 without Glass 0 Name: 27c.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Part 0 BFC CERTIFY CCW 0 without Glass 0 without Holes 0 Short Ledge 0 Slotted Pins 2 24 -16 24 -6 -4 24 -6 2 24 4 (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | [Suggest New Part]: 27b.dat - Window Classic 1 x 2 x 1 Long Ledge [DAT]
|
|
0 Window Classic 1 x 2 x 1 Long Ledge 0 Name: 27b.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Part 0 BFC CERTIFY CCW 0 with Holes 0 Long Ledge 0 Slotted Pins 2 24 -16 24 -6 -4 24 -6 2 24 4 24 -6 16 24 -6 1 16 0 24 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 pin2.dat 2 24 20 (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | [Suggest New Part]: 27a.dat - Window Classic 1 x 2 x 1 Short Ledge [DAT]
|
|
(I suggest 27c01.dat be moved to 27a.dat) 0 Window Classic 1 x 2 x 1 Short Ledge 0 Name: 27a.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Part 0 BFC CERTIFY CCW 0 without Holes 0 Short Ledge 0 Slotted Pins 2 24 -16 24 -6 -4 24 -6 2 24 4 24 -6 16 24 -6 1 (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Glut fixes and Offscreen Rendering
|
|
(...) Went there, downloaded it, followed the directions to compile it, followed the directions to install it, launched LDGLite in LEDIT mode, and it works as advertised. LDGLite accepts keyboard input now. Next question is, when will Apple (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: hose piece in set 7146
|
|
OK, the files for the 12L hose are on the Parts Tracker. Start at (URL) to get the main file, it references the subfiles. This brings up a point (which has probably been brought up before): is there a better way to number part subfiles (like x757, (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 3L
|
|
(...) Why not 6536 : Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 2L - Axle/Pin32291 : Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 2L Double - Axle/Pin+Pin Chris (22 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 3L
|
|
I have to question calling any of these an "axle joiner". They bear no resemblance in appearance or function to the basic Technic Axle Joiner 6538, which is actually designed to join two axles together rigidly. None of these "axle joiner (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
