Subject:
|
Re: Classic Windows: How many versions? Please respond!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Jan 2003 16:03:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1227 times
|
| |
|
|
Niels:
> > The window frame and the glass are actually two seperate parts,
> > glued together. When making the glassed version of the 7930 door.
> > I have been told to create a new part for the glass, currently
> > x268.dat and 7930c01 for a combination of the door 7930.dat and
> > glass x268.dat.
Tore:
> Oh no, so the 7930 door also exists in a without-glass version? I was
> happily unaware of that.
I don't know about a real glassless version of the 7930 door, but I
noticed when rendering the 368 taxi house that the 7930 door did not have
glass. The current official LDraw part 7930.dat has no glass!
Since I have only glassed versions of the door (except those where
the glass fell out...) I wanted to add glass to the door and asked
Steve or Chris about partnames. I've been told to give the glass
a seperate partnumber, since it was an actual seperate part.
> Anyway, I strongly doubt that the *glass* exists
> without door (except from after accidents), therefor the glass is NOT a
> separate part and the glassed door is NOT an assembly! The unglassed door
> (if it exists?) is a sad variant and definitely not the standard form. I
> have seven pcs of 7930 doors, all with glasses.
I think it is meant that the door and the glass are two seperate
pieces of plastic and seperately molded and thus worth two seperate
partnumbers. I think TLG also used two different numbers to identify
them.
But let the partnumber-gurus decide what we (the LDraw related community)
should use ;-)
> If you could move the glass realtive to its frame, it would have been
> different and we would need the glass as a separate part, but now it's glued
> and become a part of the one part.
On the other hand, it is more likely to have a glassless windowframe part
and use that as a subpart for the combination with glass. Saves diskspace
and prevents redundancy (maintaining two almost identical files).
> There is the Door 1 x 3 x 4 and appearantly there is also a variant that
> should be called Door 1 x 3 x 4 without Glass - even if I've never seen one.
Or the glassless version and the glass parts should have a title
starting with a tilde (~) so they don't appear as individual parts.
> >
> > I'm curious about Chris Dee's and Steve Bliss' opinion about this
> > windows issue?
> >
> > Niels
>
> I'd like to hear when and why Steve and Chris are going to use that x268.dat
> separated from its context and put into a new!
>
> > Likes these windows a lot! (as many more of the old parts)
>
> Me too, that's why I don't like the way they are treated in the LDraw library.
> /Tore
Niels
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
