To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.partsOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 4417
4416  |  4418
Subject: 
Re: Classic Windows: How many versions? Please respond!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
Date: 
Thu, 9 Jan 2003 17:51:13 GMT
Viewed: 
4389 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Niels Karsdorp writes:
> I think it is meant that the door and the glass are two seperate
> pieces of plastic and seperately molded and thus worth two seperate
> partnumbers. I think TLG also used two different numbers to identify
> them.

That's looking from the manufacturer's point of wiev. I prefer to look at
LDrawing from the builder's. When there are TLG part numbers available, of
course they should be used. But I see no point wasting 3-digit numbers in vain.

> But let the partnumber-gurus decide what we (the LDraw related community)
> should use ;-)

Maybe I should, but sometimes I just can't. ;-)

> 
> On the other hand, it is more likely to have a glassless windowframe part
> and use that as a subpart for the combination with glass. Saves diskspace
> and prevents redundancy (maintaining two almost identical files).

Doesn't save diskspace, but valuable download time. And you're right about
maintainance. Point is taken, I will make 29c.dat a subpart to (currently
suggested) 29a.dat and so on.

> 
> > There is the Door  1 x  3 x  4 and appearantly there is also a variant that
> > should be called Door  1 x  3 x  4 without Glass - even if I've never seen one.
> 
> Or the glassless version and the glass parts should have a title
> starting with a tilde (~) so they don't appear as individual parts.

Better, but not good. ;o)
Alt 1. If there is a glassless version, it's an individual part. Let's
retitle it to "7930.dat - Door  1 x  3 x  4 without Glass" and use it as
subpart to "7930a.dat - Door  1 x  3 x  4". Ok, I can stand "7930a.dat -
Door  1 x  3 x  4 with Glass".
Alt 2. If not, let's just correct the erratic current official 7930.dat. No
need for yet two more unnecessary files for the sake of Uniformity.

/Tore



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Classic Windows: How many versions? Please respond!
 
Niels: (...) Tore: (...) I don't know about a real glassless version of the 7930 door, but I noticed when rendering the 368 taxi house that the 7930 door did not have glass. The current official LDraw part 7930.dat has no glass! Since I have only (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)

9 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR