| | Re: Winners of LDraw.org's October 2001 Model/Scene Of The Month
|
|
(...) It was certainly well deserved! BTW, I think that one week voting time is a bit limited. It's also a bit odd to go and look for contestants, and only find them one out of four weeks. How about a scheme were the models were up for voting for (...) (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | Re: New Part (Corrected): 3962-1 Town Radio with Short Handle
|
|
(...) Definitely go with "Minifig". The earlier version should be 3962a.dat, whichever one that is. And yes, James wrote the Town Radio file. BTW, I re-titled all the "Town" parts awhile ago, and posted them to the new parts tracker. As part of (...) (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Future extension of dat files?
|
|
(...) I get this: C:\>assoc .ldr .ldr=l3.dat C:\>assoc .dat .dat=L3.dat But I was mucking with assoc yesterday, so don't assume this is the normal result of the registry mucking I did before then. (...) Probably LDraw.Document would be good, having (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Winners of LDraw.org's October 2001 Model/Scene Of The Month
|
|
Hi all, Sorry for being a day late, but I felt the need to have Jacob (the server admin for ldraw.org) verify the voting tallies. Not because it was close, but because I won. :-) (short pause here for a victory dance)... OK, <pant, pant) I'm back at (...) (23 years ago, 3-Oct-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | Re: Codes for New Colors (was: Sand Red Bricks)
|
|
Steve: (...) That's also my intention with them. Similarly are the POV-Ray colour codes intended to be the closest match for rendering the colours and transparancies in POV-Ray. Play well, Jacob -- (URL) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | New Part (Corrected): 3962-1 Town Radio with Short Handle [DAT]
|
|
* Is "Town..." ok, or is it better with "Minifig Radio..."? * Is 3962a.dat a better file name? * James Jessiman is the original author of Town Radio, isn't he? 0 Town Radio with Short Handle 0 Name: 3962-1.dat 0 Unofficial Part 1 16 -12 18 0 8 0 0 0 (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: New Part: 6965.dat - Scala Coffee Table 7 x 7 x 1 1/3 [DAT]
|
|
(...) Thanks Don, That's what I got for trying to set a new record in making a new part. Here's a corrected version. (I know that I left out the four partial stud4's. Anyone who likes to waste his time is free to modify...) 0 Scala Coffee Table 7 x (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: New Part: 6965.dat - Scala Coffee Table 7 x 7 x 1 1/3
|
|
(...) I think the quad on line 217 needs to be a bit larger to cover the view through the holes around the corner studs on the top. I colored it orange so you can see it here. (URL) it's quite nice. Don (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | New Part: 6965.dat - Scala Coffee Table 7 x 7 x 1 1/3 [DAT]
|
|
0 Scala Coffee Table 7 x 7 x 1 1/3 0 Name: 6965.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Unofficial Part 1 16 -60 8 -60 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4-4edge.dat 1 16 -60 32 -60 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4-4edge.dat 1 16 -60 8 -60 6 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 6 4-4cyli.dat 1 16 -60 8 -60 8 0 (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Future extension of dat files?
|
|
(...) I don't suppose you could humor me and type: assoc .ldr at a command prompt and tell me what you get. Since we seem to be standardizing on the .ldr extension and the application/x-ldraw, it might be nice to standardize the rest of the junk (...) (23 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Codes for New Colors (was: Sand Red Bricks)
|
|
(...) I always thought the RGBs in the FAQ were supposed to be approximations of the 'real colors'. LDraw's palette is a poor match for real LEGO, and I'd hate to be stuck with it's selections. Although there were some values that we didn't have any (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Codes for New Colors (was: Sand Red Bricks)
|
|
(...) Yes, but there are some problems: 1. LDraw (and LEdit) can't be changed to render new colors. So if we arbitrarily select color codes in the 0 - 255 range, the old programs won't work. 2. LDraw renders colors 17-31 the same as colors 1-15 (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Future extension of dat files?
|
|
(...) Yeah, like Tim said: the file format is staying the same. There are only two changes going on: 1. LDraw.org semi-officially endorses the .LDR extension as the standard for LDraw files. This stance doesn't have a *direct* effect on anything. 2. (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Codes for New Colors (was: Sand Red Bricks)
|
|
(...) I forgot to reply to this part of your message! Steve Bliss said that the RGB values in his table were from Suzanne D. Rich's LEGO colour page. Hence, they are approximations to the real RGB values of the bricks, not the averaged RGB values. (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | At lats my 256MB of RAM
|
|
Yes that's right I got them yersterday and I already test them on POV-RAY, Quake 3 arena and Unreal Tournament now that's power (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Re: Codes for New Colors (was: Sand Red Bricks)
|
|
(...) But isn't that the whole point? If I use the dithered colour 383 in a model, L3P will interpret it as chrome and use a special colour and reflection model for it. Rendering the same model in LDraw, however, will reveal that it is only a (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Codes for New Colors (was: Sand Red Bricks)
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) I was my impression that colors 256 to 511 are dithered combinations of colors 0 to 15, and that the RGB was the calculated average of the two dithered colors. The RGB of dithered colors is just mentioned in the FAQ as a (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Codes for New Colors (was: Sand Red Bricks)
|
|
(...) Ok, that means I will extend the internal color table to 512 entries, and allow the user to modify colors up to value 511. Just looked up the code and remembered the implementation: As current MLCad supports the following: 0-31 fixed (as in (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Codes for New Colors (was: Sand Red Bricks)
|
|
(...) This is true. When a new colour is released from LEGO, we normally aim to find a dithered colour which looks fairly much like the new colour. Then we define that particular dithered colour as the new one. That way, we can still use the old (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Codes for New Colors (was: Sand Red Bricks)
|
|
(...) Maybe I didn't understand something right, but the LDraw FAQ in section 20 mentiones that colors from 256 to 511 are dithered and not solid! So how can we have colors there? Are we not supporting dithered colors anymore? Or what is the real (...) (23 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|