| | Re: Feedback on everything CAD related
|
|
"Kyle D. Jackson" <flightdeck@sympatic...mblock.ca> wrote in message news:G8xE1z.HEp@lugnet.com... (...) Major snip. Phew... Kyle, I'm printing out your post right now and I'm going to let it sink in for a while, re-read it and try to make sense of (...) (24 years ago, 18-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Re: Feedback on everything CAD related
|
|
(...) On the other hand, if you are a new user, it is rather easy to start from the MLCAD page, go to its download page, read the instructions, then go to the provided link for the LDraw page, go to the "For Beginners" section, download the LDraw (...) (24 years ago, 18-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Re: Feedback on everything CAD related
|
|
(...) [massive snip] P.S., I did eventually get L3P to work with LGEO support, and without needing L2P. I had to reboot my machine for the LGEODIR environment setting to take effect in NT. I don't know why..., I never had to do that before. Weird :] (...) (24 years ago, 18-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Feedback on everything CAD related
|
|
G'day folks, I've got some miscelleaneous ramblings here regarding a variety of CAD software and their websites. I'm posting it here because I find it very difficult to determine who is responsible for what..., that is feedback in itself :] Also, (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | NEW PART: 30414 Brick 1 x 4 with Studs On One Side [DAT]
|
|
0 Brick 1 x 4 with Studs On One Side 0 Name: 30414.dat 0 Author: Tore Eriksson 0 Un-Official LCad Part 1 16 20 4 0 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud3.dat 1 16 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud3.dat 1 16 -20 4 0 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud3.dat 1 16 0 24 0 36 0 0 0 (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Official Model Repository Standards
|
|
Ok, I've made some changes to the Standards. One thing I forgot to say in my post was that for more information on the repository and for previous posts see www.ldraw.org/repository Anyway, here is what I made for changes... Moved "Terms" to the (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | Re: 6384 Model - Police Station
|
|
(...) [snip] George, [Note: I don't mean this to sound accusatory; I am just wondering...] Why did you post these two pieces to lugnet.cad.dat.models? If you would like them to become official parts you probably should have sent them to (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Official Model Repository Standards
|
|
(...) I don't quite understand what this means, probably because I've just been unaware as to what the OMR actually is. Is it a center where you download models into a standard directory, as is done with 'Parts'? And one question about sub-models (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | Re: MSP, MAP, and "Bear" Hard Suit .DAT files now available!
|
|
Thanks Gary! Yeah, I like the "Bear" too, probably because you don't need a whole ton of parts to make one. (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
|
| | Re: MSP, MAP, and "Bear" Hard Suit .DAT files now available!
|
|
Thanks Travis! Yes, like it says on the MAP webpage: "rail gun usually fires two types of munitions: the standard metallic, depleted uranium slug or, a surface piercing tactical nuclear warhead." (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
|
| | Re: Official model repository situation
|
|
(...) Why not use the same naming convention as the LUGNET DB ? That way we can cross-reference easily, there could be an option to download the .dat file just like there is now a "download building instructions from brickshelf". Well, assuming Todd (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | RE: Official model repository situation
|
|
(...) My reasoning was that this would group all the files together and make them instantly recognizable in people's model folders. If the filename started with a number, it would get grouped with unofficial parts, for example. --Bram Bram Lambrecht (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | Re: MSP, MAP, and "Bear" Hard Suit .DAT files now available!
|
|
I meant to tell you before that I realy like the Bear, I've been waiting for the .dat. Gary Mladen Pejic <milovan@netcom.ca> wrote in message news:G8vxM2.6sF@lugnet.com... (...) and (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
|
| | Re: MSP, MAP, and "Bear" Hard Suit .DAT files now available!
|
|
I'm referring to the MAP BTW. (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
|
| | Re: MSP, MAP, and "Bear" Hard Suit .DAT files now available!
|
|
Cool. Are the red and gray models ammunition for the rail gun? Travis Dickinson (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
|
| | MSP, MAP, and "Bear" Hard Suit .DAT files now available!
|
|
Get ready to fire up those L-CAD editors/viewers... MSP: (2 URLs) Hard Suit: (URL) I can finally disassemble those two behemoths!!! BTW sorry it took this long to MLCAD these models; I was busy with exams and school... Mladen Pejic, over and out! (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.build, lugnet.space, lugnet.cad)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Official Model Repository Standards
|
|
"Ryan Dennett" <rdennett@firehousemail.com> wrote in message news:G8vs4v.K4s@lugnet.com... (...) I have some nitpicking to do, not too much though. :o) All of the meat of this post is fine the way I see it, but there needs to be some (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | LDraw.org Official Model Repository Standards
|
|
Ok, I have made some changes to the OMR Standards based on the feedback that has been given. If there is no major objections than this is how the Standard will remain, but as always feedback is nescessary for things to work well. I think that most (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | Re: Official model repository situation
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:3a8dab56.648880...net.com... (...) I remember you used those examples when we were originally hashing this - in fact, they're cited in a post of mine setting the current standard back then. (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | Re: Another MLCad suggestion
|
|
(...) I have a small network of Sun Microstations that have a very large amount of raw processing capability. I have already tested POV on it - I convinced my supervisor to let me install it to simulate a overload on the servers. They pulled through (...) (24 years ago, 17-Feb-01, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|