 | | Re: Upgrading to Windows 2000 Professional
|
|
Any Win32 based software package should function great. IE ML-Cad. However LDraw most likely will not run due to the DOS mode that will make direct hardware calls. I'm currently running Windows 2000 on another computer and was playing with ML-Cad on (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.organization
|
|
(...) Right. But if something new and plainly better (in all aspects) comes along, we can as easily label it "LDraw Mk II" as any other name. Assuming the author(s) would go along willingly, of course. :) Steve (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
|
(...) And I'd still be happy to include the results of that effort under the LDraw umbrella. I think Jacob still has documents on his server about "LDraw II". But we don't need to write a new format -- it's already there. Heck, there are a bunch of (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Upgrading to Windows 2000 Professional
|
|
"Heather Patey" <hpatey@nfld.com> wrote in message news:G5ttBJ.EDA@lugnet.com... (...) be (...) I've already made the move. As far as I can tell, everything works except the original LEdit, becuase win2k doesn't like DOS applications. You can still (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Upgrading to Windows 2000 Professional
|
|
I'm about to upgrade my operating system from Win95 to Win2K. Has anyone done this yet, and are there issues with the common LCAD software that I ought to be aware of? Wouldn't want to be stuck without my virtual bricks. Thanks, Heather -- Heather (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org announces new MLCad subdomain and re-organization of resources
|
|
Tim: (...) Good to hear that you can get through without problems now. (...) I haven't done anything like that, but the net changes now and then. Jacob -- No .sig today. (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Throwbot parts
|
|
Has anyone modeled the little flap piece that goes on the head of throwbots? It's usually patterned. I know the head piece has been done and is in the Technic category, but I'm not sure even where I would look for the flap piece. -John Van (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: What Happened to my Primitives?
|
|
(...) Doh! Well, okay. I guess it's either that or have all my LCad bricks running around with no studs on them! Dave! (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
|
(...) I was under the impression that we could get together and write a completely new program that wouldn't rely on the current LDraw format, the only thing left from the current programs would be the parts library imported until parts were redone (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
|
(...) Looks like Steve is already working on it... (...) Yes, but we should still make full updates available for people who don't want the latest version. I'll start writing an update download program, looks like it's the only thing left to do. (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on new Parts Tracker
|
|
Great news, Steve. If this streamlines the whole request / submission / review / acceptance process, then IMHO it is worth working on this in advance of the next parts voting. Might you be able to backload the outstanding submission queue into the (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 3069p25.dat, now POV-RAY friendly! ;-)
|
|
(...) Whilst you are updating this, would you consider changing the rect.dat primitives used for the square "buttons" to type 4 lines? IIRC, there are not contrasting colour borders around these elements of the pattern. Chris (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.organization
|
|
(...) Shouldn't the latter be mlcad.ldraw.lcad.org? I tend to view any program which uses the LDraw parts library in any way as a descendant of the LDraw heritage, and hence as a subset of "LDraw in the wider sense". If a LEGO CAD program "Xyzzy" (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
|
"Leonardo Zide" <leonardo@centroin.com.br> wrote in message news:3A3E8A88.A941C2....com.br... (...) Yeah. I like the idea of another site, but I'm still strongly listening to the people who say to keep it at LDraw.org. Its good to have the name and (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on new Parts Tracker
|
|
Great Steve, 'cause I'm getting really tired of managing the Temporary Tracker. Good Luck, /Tore (...) -- Tore Eriksson Sweden ICQ: 76066510 LEGO: MOC++++ FS,SP,TO++ TC+ LS YB@m (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 3069p25.dat, now POV-RAY friendly! ;-)
|
|
(...) Done. (...) Done. (...) Done. (...) OK, but I left in "button" (singular). ;-) (...) Oops. :-( OK, I'm sending you the revised file in a separate email. I'll send the DAT file as an attachment, which, IIRC, is how you've said in the past that (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Working on new Parts Tracker
|
|
Hi, y'all! I wanted to let you know I'm working on a new Parts Tracker. So far, "working" consists of doing some basic analysis around required functionality and UI. And asking Dan Boger if he could/would lend a hand with design and implementation. (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: re-name "patterned" parts?...
|
|
(...) You realize you answered your own question? The spacing was inherited from James Jessiman, but it works better to have it there. If some programs/people don't want the spaces, it's easy enough to delete them. It would be more challenging to (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: re-name "patterned" parts?...
|
|
(...) This would do what you want, unless there was another, similar part, whose name is the same as the master part, except the final dimension included a fractional part, such as "... 2 & 1/3". Not that this is something that commonly collides (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Ldraw.organization (was: License revision 1)
|
|
(...) I agree with that because currently ldraw.org is working as l-cad.org, but l-cad.org will have to focus on other stuff as well. (...) I think it would be better to have the FAQ split, there should be a smaller FAQ with only questions that (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
