 | | Re: Horse Progress Report
|
|
(...) Just try not to make a mesh of things. (...) I've taken two or three horses apart. Be a bit careful, to avoid marring the edges where the two halves come together. Steve (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC checking program (was Re: Some Words To BFC)
|
|
(...) Umm, it's a little more than that, but facing the faces is a very important part. Basically, I meant: 1. All polygons wound correctly 2. All subfile references clean Good point about primitives not being solid. I don't think a renderer (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Is James' website finally gone for good?
|
|
(...) Sure. They said they'd be in contact with me as soon as they returned, so I'll bring it up then. -Tim (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDRAW Troubles
|
|
(...) I had the same problem when I upgraded to a faster computer. I couldn't solve the problem, but then I thought: "Why should I? I never use LDraw.exe or LEdit anymore." Now I use LDLite exclusively instead. /Tore (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) Yes, it did. But I'm pretty sure that all important topics have been addressed (or re-addressed) since that thread started. (...) Yes, and today it will change to version 10. But version 4 was a big rewrite, where the language changed from (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) Actually, the problem is that their determinant is 0, neither positive nor negative. So the renderer would have to disable BFC processing for any file with this kind of reference. Another problem (that L3P handles in most cases) is that (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) Oh, good. :) I wasn't sure before, but after posting a follow-up to John today, I figured it out. Now, about those transparent parts with decorations... Steve (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) I think we're using different meanings here. By 'local clipping', I mean the clip-setting in a subfile disappears when that subfile is finished. It is not carried back up to the superfile, and it is not reinstated if the same subfile is used (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LDRAW Troubles
|
|
I have LDRAW, downloaded from LDRAW.org, and I keep getting a runtime error 200. I downloade and ran the patch that the site has. Still doesn't work. Any advice? (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) Unless we have a solution to the invert case, the document's assertion is correct. (...) I think you are correct that NOWIND/UNKNOWN is not important/needed. For now, let's proceed assuming that decorations will be handled by using NOCLIP or (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Horse Progress Report
|
|
(...) Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC: LITS 2
|
|
(...) I've kept thinking about it, and I don't see a solution. There are some algorithms that can figure out the normal/inverted question in some cases, but these algorithms would be too slow to implement in a rendering program. And they are not (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Horse Progress Report
|
|
(...) Thanks. :) (...) Thanks for the hint, Steve. I'll give it a try. But if you're wrong, my daughter will not be too happy about you! :o) /Tore (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: '59 Caddy Hovercar Raytraces
|
|
this is quite cool, bram. i particularly like the use of pink elements and the bubble over the cockpit/driver's seat. it opens up a whole new range of possibilities (flying versions of classic cars). good stuff! ..joseph g (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, lugnet.town, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Is James' website finally gone for good?
|
|
(...) Tim, do you want to ask them, as the head honcho of ldraw.org content? Jacob, do you have a copy of James' site-files? I do, if you don't. Oops--I just checked, his site is back online. But maybe it makes sense to have a permanent mirror in (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Mladen's HW Police Copter (alternate colors)
|
|
thanks, john i've also done that color scheme (i call it space police III) for a couple of my own models just for fun. if you liked the sub-theme color-swapping check out roger rothhaar's page, (URL) got some very cool models (mobile outpost and (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: 71184 Bar 4.5L Straight is too short
|
|
(...) I don't have the fix, but I did locate it on lugnet.cad.dat.parts. Normally, I'd require you to e-mail me the fix before I'd put it in an official release, but since you're a good modeler, I'll let it go this once. Just don't tell anyone. ;) (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Some Words To BFC
|
|
(...) OK, here's a counter-proposal: don't require all parts/primitives to be BFC'able, and allow both BFC-ready and BFC-not-ready files in the same rendering. This reintroduces the concept of having a single meta-statement at the start of each (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Performance Improvement [DAT]
|
|
(...) As I said before, in this case it's more correct to use 3-4disc primitive, to avoid the T type juntions. (...) Yes, cracks may appear ! Same problem like in a T type junction But has someone said, nothing like real/concrete testing, so here (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Horse Progress Report
|
|
(...) It's looking good. I think your mesh is fine. BTW, you can dissassemble a horse using a letter opener. The two halves of the body are just friction-fit together, not permanently connected (ie, they are not glued, cemented, nor welded). I think (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
