 | | Re: new part - 71014 - castle greatsword - revised
|
|
Franklin W. Cain <fwcain@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:20000328190244....ail.com... (...) Nice work on the quillions (I'm sure that was fun:), and the handle is much improved, too. Just a few nits to point out: Where you extended the cylinder on (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Problem with 1-4con1.dat [DAT]
|
|
The type 5 lines in 1-4con1.dat are coded color 16, rather than color 24 as they should be. (Unless I missed an update of this primitive.) 0 1/4 Cone Section 1:2 Radius 0 Name: 1-4con1.dat 0 Author: Karim Nassar 0 Official LCad update 99-05 -> 5 16 (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: 6641.dat Technic Changeover Catch
|
|
(...) I agree with you Fredrik, but to modelise this part, I used the same orientation as in the mockup made by Jonathan Wilson. Changing this orientation will change the models using this part. So could we change the orientation of a part if the (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Throwbot foot
|
|
(...) Fredrik you are right, the axle is too thin. Steve, the reason is because I modelise the parts with a CAD CAM program then I convert the part to dat with my program STL2AT. For the moment, this program recognize only cylindric primitives. I (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: looking for 3425
|
|
(...) Apparantly. I cannot find the part number in any parts reference, so what i it? /Tore (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | looking for 3425
|
|
Can it really be true that the 3425 hasn't been done? Regards John (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | new part - 71014 - castle greatsword - revised [DAT]
|
|
I updated this DAT file, incorporating all the suggestions that I received. Please LMKWYT. Thanks, Franklin 0 Castle Greatsword 0 Filename: 71014.DAT 0 Author: Franklin W. Cain (fwcain@yahoo.com) 0 Unofficial Element 0 0 CATEGORY Minifig Accessory 0 (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New part : Minifig Torso with Patch Pocket Pattern
|
|
Chris Dee <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Fs56r5.1Gu@lugnet.com... (...) The (...) that (...) than (...) I would say keep using the technique. Minifigs are most often viewed in models at a distance where they look better with the (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Cataloging Program
|
|
(...) This problem is why I chose PNG. It compresses flat shaded images quite well and still retains the true color pixels. My comprehensive testing of one sample image (the one on the LdGLite web page) put the PNG file at about half the size of the (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New part : Minifig Torso with Patch Pocket Pattern
|
|
(...) I noticed that too, but dismissed it as a rendering artifact, which I suppose it is. Do you think this means we should stop using this technique? The town torsos I have done without the hidden lines look bad in L3Lab at low mag - so I was (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Cataloging Program
|
|
(...) Is there some other way to compress JPG files, besides lowering the quality? Whenever I save a JPG file with 100% accuracy, the saved file is huge (ie, about the same size as a similar BMP file). (...) I've never heard of any kind of (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Throwbot foot
|
|
(...) Marc, Fredrik's post prompted me to look more closely at this part. I noticed that there are references to any of the axle primitives. Is there a reason you did not use any of these primitive files in your file? Steve (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Gonna build a mountain in my living room.
|
|
(...) I was planning on making mine about 8 studs wide. I think that I can do it, even though I wasn't so sure earlier, but you reinspired me. I have been able to create doors that fold up, and don't look to bad, and wheels that fold down. (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
|
Leonardo Zide <leonardo@centroin.com.br> wrote in message news:38DFDCB4.594866....com.br... (...) So what test do you run to determine what studs get removed? -John Van (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Throwbot foot
|
|
To me, the axle sticking out from the centre of the foot appears to have a little bit too thin cross sections. This observation is only based on viewing the part in L3Lab, so it may be wrong. What do you think? Other than that, it looks good! (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 32165 Technic Throwbot Head
|
|
Wow! What a part! Great work! If there is one thing I can nitpick about, it would be the lower "partial" axle hole. The real part has two small "nibs" on the lower portion, which are used to hold an axle in place. You can hear a "click" sound if (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6641.dat Technic Changeover Catch
|
|
This part certainly looks very good! I'm a bit unsure about it's orientation, though. Perhaps it could benefit from having the same orientation and origin as "32039 Technic Connector with Axlehole" and "3651 Technic Connector"? The part does have (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 6539.dat Technic Driving Ring
|
|
The part does not appear to have the "clip" detail which is seen in the centre of the real part. But the part still looks great, so I would definitively vote for it in the LCAD update. Great work! I also agree with your choice of orientation. (I (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 6539.dat Technic Driving Ring [DAT]
|
|
0 Technic Driving Ring 0 Name: 6539.dat 0 Author: Marc Klein 0 Created with stl2dat conversion tool 0 Un-Official LCad part 1 16 0 0 9 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 -4 0 4-4cyli.dat 1 16 0 0 9 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 -1 0 4-4edge.dat 1 16 0 0 5 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 -1 0 (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L3PLiTE?
|
|
(...) I have done something like that for LeoCAD, it removes the studs above and below the bricks and plates for the rendering. I haven't added this option for the POV-Ray export but that's something that I can do if you want. Leonardo (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
