Subject:
|
Re: 6641.dat Technic Changeover Catch
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 Mar 2000 20:32:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1725 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000 09:20:49 GMT, Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote:
> This part certainly looks very good!
>
> I'm a bit unsure about it's orientation, though. Perhaps it could
> benefit from having the same orientation and origin as "32039 Technic
> Connector with Axlehole" and "3651 Technic Connector"? The part does
> have much in common with the latter parts, so a common orientatin may
> be in place.
>
> What do other people think? I know that the part was originaly used
> to change gears, and with this in mind, the orientation Marc Klein
> used is pretty much appropriate. But the part has recently been used
> for other things as well, eg in the sets 8001, 8002 and 8459.
>
> Fredrik
I agree with you Fredrik, but to modelise this part, I used the same orientation as in the mockup made by Jonathan
Wilson. Changing this orientation will change the models using this part.
So could we change the orientation of a part if the mockup was oriented diffenrently ?
What do other people think about that ?
Are they many models using the 6641.dat mockup file ?
If the answer to that question is no, I think that we could quietly change the orientation of the Changeover Catch.
Marc.
Marc Klein
A Mindstorms fan.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 6641.dat Technic Changeover Catch
|
| (...) In my opinion, mock-ups and unofficial parts as just that: unofficial. People using them should know that the orientation and origin may change when (if) the parts become official. So I think it is safe to change the orientation of your part (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 6641.dat Technic Changeover Catch
|
| This part certainly looks very good! I'm a bit unsure about it's orientation, though. Perhaps it could benefit from having the same orientation and origin as "32039 Technic Connector with Axlehole" and "3651 Technic Connector"? The part does have (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
