Subject:
|
Re: icosahedron in soccer-ball style
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.sculpture
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 19:53:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
995 times
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
I think ‘bigger’ is the way to go on this one. *grin*
|
With Lego, I’m always trying to go ‘smaller’ i.e. how small can you go and
still get away with it. Partly it’s a joy in simplicity, partly a lack of
parts (hence my articulated horse).
|
Or you can go simpler: if you suppress the triangles inside the pentagon, the
problem disappear!
But the structure may look somewhat hollow...
Philo
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: icosahedron in soccer-ball style
|
| Well, that's weird. My original message said: (...) But you're copy of it said: (...) I wonder how that got mixed up? < shrug > Anyway, back to my original idea. The reason I had suggested 4/3/4 was based on Phillippe's formula of 4/3.5/3.5 -- (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.build.sculpture, FTX)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
