Subject:
|
Re: A Question for all you CAD Mech builders...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.mecha
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Jun 2000 02:11:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
979 times
|
| |
| |
I'm kinda sorry Mark, got to carried away. To tell you the truth I would like
to see more people using LEGO CAD programs, because then I could actually see
how peoples models are built, and learn something from it. I too, really don't
mind real photos, but do mind how it sometimes detracts from the model. Sorry
again, Mark, I at least now know your line of reasoning!
Mladen Pejic, over and out!
http://tor-pw1.netcom.ca/~milovan/index.htm
In lugnet.build.mecha, Mark Sandlin writes:
> In lugnet.build.mecha, Mladen Pejic writes:
>
> > So you think I don't do that? I build all my models the same way as you, except
> > that after I have built them IRL I make them in MLCAD. So you see, I put twice
> > as much effort as you do in a model.
>
> Not really. The creative effort that goes into the model is over once you
> finish building it IRL. After that, you're merely copying your already-built
> model. I'd rather spend that time building something else IRL.
>
> Still, it's your time, do what you want with it.
>
> > > > And to say use LEGO CAD users "cheat" is silly, doesn't
> > > > TLG "cheat" when they make a model with new colours? It's not like
> > > > there is a standard palette of colours for LEGO, every year more new
> > > > colours come out!
> > >
> > > Ok, so "cheat" wasn't a good word choice. At any rate, as above, it takes
> > > much of the challenge out of building.
> >
> > No, it enhances the model, it makes the model more accurate to your vision. I
> > mean what would you rather look at, a patchwork coloured mecha, or a nicely
> > colour scemed one?
>
> Of course I'd rather see once that's nicely colored.
>
> I think you're under the impression that I'm trying to put down LCAD,
> which I'm not. I think it's a great way to share your models, and build
> things you couldn't ordinarily build. I'd still rather see photos of your
> MOCs, however. It makes the experience more "real" IMHO.
>
> >
> > > > BTW I think, I would rather see a nicely rendered LEGO model, than see
> > > > a poorly shot LEGO model.
> > >
> > > I'll take Real over Virtual any day.
> >
> > Sure, if you like bad lighting, and ahem, BLURRY pictures.
>
> Are you insinuating something?
>
> >
> > Anyway, unless you are a Mac owner
>
> I am, though I also have a PC.
>
> > (although isn't there a LEGO Cad program for
> > it too?)
>
> It doesn't work very well.
>
> > anyone with a PC and a modem can download all the programs free of
> > charge and make good use of them. You see, with programs like POV-Ray, the
> > playing field is leveled out, everyones models are presented the same way,
> > while with cameras, a person with a digital camera has the advantage over a
> > inexperienced camera owner.
>
> Or someone who is using a digital camera that is old enough that the
> focus depth can't be less than 3 feet? I had that problem with my last
> batch of pictures. I had the misfortune of using a borrowed 2-year-old
> Sony Mavica that just wouldn't focus up close. Please don't assume that
> it's because of inexperience. I'm getting a new camera this week, so no
> more blurry pics.
>
> At any rate, I've done nothing more here than list my own, personal
> reasons for not using LCAD. I'm not saying you're wrong for enjoying it,
> I'm just telling you why -I- don't use it.
>
> ~Mark
>
> >
> > > > Mladen Pejic, over and out!
> > > > http://tor-pw1.netcom.ca/~milovan/index.htm
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: A Question for all you CAD Mech builders...
|
| Hey no problem.. I just don't want us to argue over something that is clearly a simple matter of opinion. It's easy to have misunderstandings in newsgroups. ~M (...) actually see (...) don't (...) model. Sorry (...) you, (...) put (...) like (...) (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jun-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A Question for all you CAD Mech builders...
|
| (...) except (...) twice (...) Not really. The creative effort that goes into the model is over once you finish building it IRL. After that, you're merely copying your already-built model. I'd rather spend that time building something else IRL. (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jun-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|