To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.mechaOpen lugnet.build.mecha in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Mecha / 304
303  |  305
Subject: 
Re: Designation conflict
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.mecha
Date: 
Fri, 17 Mar 2000 18:15:26 GMT
Viewed: 
1445 times
  
Or maybe something like, "Whoa, nelly!"

Seriously, I'd go with Stephen's suggestions.  8)

Ben
--
Ben Vaughan
buster@marsbase.com
http://www.marsbase.com
"Sproaticus" <jsproat@io.com> wrote in message
news:38D26DF4.6F8DFE43@io.com...
Stephen F Roberts wrote:
Travis Dickinson <travis@pdn.net> wrote:
What's the designation for a mecha that is going to be twice the height • of a
heavy mecha?  Should the previous mecha be down graded in class?
...'Dat really big mecha?....

Nope.  The technical term is a big'un.  :-,

Cheers,
- jsproat

--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
Card-carrying member of the Star-Bellied Sneech Preservation Society



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Designation conflict
 
These are all things I need to think about, with the finish of my HM-9 Enforcer. ;^) ~Mark (...) (25 years ago, 20-Mar-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Designation conflict
 
(...) Nope. The technical term is a big'un. :-, Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)

16 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR