To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.build.mechaOpen lugnet.build.mecha in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Building / Mecha / 10808
10807  |  10809
Subject: 
Re: State of .mecha
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.mecha
Date: 
Thu, 20 May 2004 20:31:54 GMT
Viewed: 
948 times
  
In lugnet.build.mecha, Bill Fitzgerald wrote:
As a builder myself I have an issue with the concept of this group focusing on
the Japanese "MECHA" concept. In brief, I dont do designs of this type. I do
designs that would more likely be called MECHS. In reality I don't do Mechs
either, I do a variation of them called HERCs or Titans. I also do Flyers and
heavy armored vehicles, but I am concerned most about the walking type Hercs or
Titans.
Ah, so you are the one responsible for Bigs Herc bay? Excellent work!

If this group adopts the focus of the Japanese Human like robot, then what is to
become of the rest? Mechs, Hercs, Moble suits (other than Gundums), those that
have four or more legs, and any others that dont fall into the basic concopt
that is being put forth as "Mecha"? It seems to me that this group should be
about inclusion not exclusion. I already feel excluded enough from this group.

Although i am certain that this group will always accept mecha/mechs in any
form, i think that many who build lego mechanized walkers tend to go with mecha,
which means the majority of those who actually post about them have a preference
to mecha. I myself began by building mechs from the mechwarrior series, then
began building mecha (which i had an ardent distaste for earlier). However, i
would prefer to see a nice Warhammer or Timberwolf than a Gundam myself :D

I personally do not post my designs here for several reasons, mostly because i
have my own website of my work. It is a bit out of date because after my father
passed away my heart was no in it. But now I have jumped back in to building. I
also do not physically build designs, I use Ldraw and MLCAD to design and
construct them and then render them in 3D images. Which leads me to another
point about this group. It has, as a general rule, looked down on people like
myself that only do virtual modelling. This is also a reason I do not post my
work here.

Bigs

I really wouldn't say that the group looks down upon those who do their models
virtually. Primus Bus (in my opinion) is a well-known and respected builder and
he does alot of his building virtually. I think its just that A.) not many
people do their creations primarily in mlcad/ldraw and B) an actual physical
model is (again, in my opinon) downright more aesthetic then a computer
generated model.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: State of .mecha
 
As a builder myself I have an issue with the concept of this group focusing on the Japanese "MECHA" concept. In brief, I dont do designs of this type. I do designs that would more likely be called MECHS. In reality I don't do Mechs either, I do a (...) (21 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.build.mecha)

17 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR