Subject:
|
Re: State of .mecha
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.mecha
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 May 2004 04:41:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
708 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.build.mecha, Jon Palmer wrote:
> This is an excellent post. While I believe that LEGO is cool because you can
> build whatever you want, I think that for a long time most of the creations
> in .mecha aren't even Mecha. They can be some cool creations but they don't
> really push forward the ideas and culture of the real {Japanese} genre.
I'm going to head off a long and flame ridden argument by asking for
clarification here. What, exactly, does this mean?
> This is one of the main reasons I haven't been more active in the group. Now
> to be sure, I *do not* consider most of the few Robriq I have made to be
> Mecha. Robriq for me is what I'm making as I try to learn how to build Mecha.
> Probably mostly cute Mecha, but you get the idea. So I'm not saying in any
> way that I'm a mecha builder,(I want to be) but I feel like I know what
> looks good.
Doesn't Toshiro count?
Soren
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: State of .mecha
|
| (...) Probably a good idea. I don't have any malice towards other styles. I love almost all LEGO building. What I mostly mean is that I think the content of the group should strive to meet the coolness that is its name: Mecha. I think this is the (...) (20 years ago, 14-May-04, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: State of .mecha
|
| (...) (snip) This is an excellent post. While I believe that LEGO is cool because you can build whatever you want, I think that for a long time most of the creations in .mecha aren't even Mecha. They can be some cool creations but they don't really (...) (20 years ago, 14-May-04, to lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
