 | | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
(...) I feel that publicising leaks is most definitely in TLGs best interests. If we can find stuff then it means their competitors can do the same if they're interested. Security by obsfucation has never been successful and is unlikely to ever be (...) (17 years ago, 27-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
(...) To answer your question: Leaks are an issue that TLG is concerned about. The Ambassadors also felt that this should be listed as an issue in the best interest of their business, as well as for the fans. As Lenny pointed out in another thread, (...) (17 years ago, 27-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
10) Continual information leaks on upcoming LEGO sets/themes. (Corporate Security) Is this something TLG is concerned about or something AFOLs are concerned about? Personally, I'll take all the information (leaked or otherwise) I can get. Marc (...) (17 years ago, 27-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
(...) Please, let's not turn this thread into a "Wish List", okay? (We all have those.) Instead, please focus on our listed "issues", or suggest something that was not covered in the list - especially anything that impacts very large groups of (or (...) (17 years ago, 27-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
(...) I wish they would go back to the days when the picture on the box was an actual photograph of the set and not a computer rendering at all. (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
(...) This is an interesting question about how representation should be spread. I believe that each fan should feel like they have access to an Ambassador to a reasonable degree. That is an ideal that, from cycle to cycle, we should move closer to. (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
Thanks! Every little helps! God bless, Nathan (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
(...) I don't know if it was in the list or not - but instruction quality has been brought up in discussions with TLG people. Especially the black issue, because they used to have such a great solution: outline the black pieces in white. I think it (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Official "Issues List"
|
|
(...) Nelson - thanks for this, I think this is exactly what the community would like to see! Regarding more issues, one thing I don't see on the list that I'd like to is the poor representations of rendered box art and instructions, e.g. when you (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | The Official "Issues List"
|
|
In my 'Status Report" post, I mentioned: (...) The issues list is now posted on the (URL) sidebar. These issues, regarding LEGO products and services worldwide, should come as no surprise to anyone, as they have been brought to the Ambassadors' (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
Aaron, Its not an unfair indictment on my part. I must admit to being a bit more of an observer and less outgoing than Jake, one of the parts of my job I'm working on at the moment and I will do my best to be more available online. Steve (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
(...) Not to pick on you Felix (I would've voted for you in an ambassador contest or just about anything else your MOCs are so interesting ; ) but this line is worth responding to. Eurobricks is without representation despite, I'm told, many of (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
(...) I'll bite. This is a mixed question for sure. Product development and release of information are what need to be kept secret absolutely. The people who work on marketing plans and developing new things are dependant on the information not (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
Lenny, I can share what I made during the Billund design trip because I was granted permission by the Castle product design lead. At Brickworld 2007 I gave a presentation on fan involvement in the design process. Currently I am working on an online (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
(...) I agree communities should choose who represents them. But if it was based on a voting system imagine what would happen; Would people start going to forums and campaigning-- or worse, mudslinging to get votes? I can see that getting really (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
(...) Let me say that I understand your sentiment and your frustration. My aim here is to outline some of the issues that make it difficult to do what seems obvious. Big part of the secrecy issue is actually figuring out what must be kept secret and (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
(...) While I agree and reiterate Dave's points, I think that LEGO sees the ambassador program a bit differently. They are not LEGO employees assigned as ambassadors to the AFOL community. I believe LEGO sees them as AFOL members assigned as (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
(...) Just a point here. I think this is part of why the Ambassadors got that "Unbassador" logo that I'm sure everyone has seen floating around. Here's a perfect example of something that you could have shared with the community, but didn't and (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
(...) That's still a little vague. I just think if the ambassadors are going to complain in the name of the community, the community should get a say in what they complain about. Personally, I think it'd be better to take just a couple of the (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
(...) What's on the list? The standard range of complaints that you read about on this or other fora: complaints about colour and quality, piece and set design, themes, gender bias/availability, leaks, availability and pricing and so on. Why? (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
