To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.termsOpen lugnet.admin.terms in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Terms of Use / 376
375  |  377
Subject: 
Re: Apology.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms
Date: 
Mon, 26 Nov 2001 09:30:43 GMT
Viewed: 
61 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
He did what he did *knowing* it breaks the ToU here. He did what he did
*knowing* it was a violation of my privacy rights. He did what he did in his
usual belligerent manner:

==+==
See, I march to my own metronome, and the violation of his privacy rights
when weighed against the harm he causes here on a daily basis with his lies
and slurs and troublemaking just tilted the balance for me to do something I
know is a violation of the ToS.
==+==

Actually, I think you're both wrong.  I just reveiwed the terms of use, and
there is nothing in there about e-mail addresses, except the requirement to
have a valid one in your posting ID.  So if you still feel that Larry
violated your privacy, pursue it through the appropriate civil authority,
but please stop dragging your personal grief with him all over Lugnet.

Trimmed lugnet.general from the FUT, this is *not* a general discussion, no
matter how much publicity you want:
http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=1

Can you read? Check who set the FUT. It was not I.

Scott A


James



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Apology.
 
Hmm.. this is interesting. Are you saying that you did not write this: "Ban him. Scott A FUT lugent.admin.general x-posted to .general, as this is an issue which concerns us all... or at least is should." (...) Personally, I think Scott should be (...) (23 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Apology.
 
(...) Actually, I think you're both wrong. I just reveiwed the terms of use, and there is nothing in there about e-mail addresses, except the requirement to have a valid one in your posting ID. So if you still feel that Larry violated your privacy, (...) (23 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)

31 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR