To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.termsOpen lugnet.admin.terms in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Terms of Use / 376
375  |  377
Subject: 
Re: Apology.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms
Date: 
Mon, 26 Nov 2001 09:30:43 GMT
Viewed: 
79 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > He did what he did *knowing* it breaks the ToU here. He did what he did
> > *knowing* it was a violation of my privacy rights. He did what he did in his
> > usual belligerent manner:
> > 
> > ==+==
> > See, I march to my own metronome, and the violation of his privacy rights
> > when weighed against the harm he causes here on a daily basis with his lies
> > and slurs and troublemaking just tilted the balance for me to do something I
> > know is a violation of the ToS.
> > ==+==
> 
> Actually, I think you're both wrong.  I just reveiwed the terms of use, and
> there is nothing in there about e-mail addresses, except the requirement to
> have a valid one in your posting ID.  So if you still feel that Larry
> violated your privacy, pursue it through the appropriate civil authority,
> but please stop dragging your personal grief with him all over Lugnet.
> 
> Trimmed lugnet.general from the FUT, this is *not* a general discussion, no
> matter how much publicity you want:
> http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=1

Can you read? Check who set the FUT. It was not I.

Scott A

> 
> James



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Apology.
 
Hmm.. this is interesting. Are you saying that you did not write this: "Ban him. Scott A FUT lugent.admin.general x-posted to .general, as this is an issue which concerns us all... or at least is should." (...) Personally, I think Scott should be (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Apology.
 
(...) Actually, I think you're both wrong. I just reveiwed the terms of use, and there is nothing in there about e-mail addresses, except the requirement to have a valid one in your posting ID. So if you still feel that Larry violated your privacy, (...) (25 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)

31 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR