| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> He did what he did *knowing* it breaks the ToU here. He did what he did
> *knowing* it was a violation of my privacy rights. He did what he did in his
> usual belligerent manner:
>
> ==+==
> See, I march to my own metronome, and the violation of his privacy rights
> when weighed against the harm he causes here on a daily basis with his lies
> and slurs and troublemaking just tilted the balance for me to do something I
> know is a violation of the ToS.
> ==+==
Actually, I think you're both wrong. I just reveiwed the terms of use, and
there is nothing in there about e-mail addresses, except the requirement to
have a valid one in your posting ID. So if you still feel that Larry
violated your privacy, pursue it through the appropriate civil authority,
but please stop dragging your personal grief with him all over Lugnet.
Trimmed lugnet.general from the FUT, this is *not* a general discussion, no
matter how much publicity you want:
http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=1
James
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Apology.
|
| (...) I believe you are incorrect. First, if it's against the spirit of the ToU for a spammer to harvest email addresses against the will of the participants, it's against the spirit of the ToU for an UNspammer to harvest a single email address (...) (23 years ago, 25-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
Message is in Reply To:
31 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
