 | | Re: offline building instructions...
|
|
(...) Kiernan, Please re-read the LUGNET Terms of Use Agreement[1], specifically point #14 of the Discussion Group Terms and Conditions... You are certainly welcome to post here using a .lego.com address, but your posts must each include your title, (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Linking to LUGNET image files?
|
|
(...) That is absolutely correct. I don't mind direct linking to anything on the website. The bandwidth from direct linking is very small compared with the overall traffic. Specifically, the scan library is a community resource so you should feel (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: New stock in - Look before I auction it.
|
|
(...) Todd, we seem to have returned to this problem again. We still don't have clear rules which indicate that it is wrong to list "these items available for straight sale for 2-3 weeks before I auction them". It seems to me that this is a (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Linking to LUGNET image files?
|
|
(...) Forget it. Use the images on www.brickset.com . Huw, who runs the site, does not mind as long as you give him mention by linking to his site. He also offers pictures of the figures in most sets so that one can use them too... I do. See here (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: New stock in - Look before I auction it.
|
|
I was not trying to advertise my auction. If you look at the site you will see that I have current auctions on which I did not mention. I have got over 100 sets which are listed to sell which is why I put the comment on buy-sell- trade. I will try (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: New stock in - Look before I auction it.
|
|
maybe, but the subject line is confusing (now that i re-read it, i see what you're saying, but the first time... not so much) (...) (24 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: New stock in - Look before I auction it.
|
|
I read this as "You have 2-3 weeks before I sell this stuff elsewhere. Get it while you can." Not as an auction announcement. The site does list sets (at least Technic sets) for sale at a specific price. I see this as for-sale. (...) (24 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: New stock in - Look before I auction it.
|
|
(...) Alison, Are you trying to sneak an auction announcement into the .buy-sell-trade group or was this just an accidental oversight? Please re-read the LUGNET Terms of Use Agreement if you are confused: (URL) please re-read the second sentence of (...) (24 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Beware more SPAM from Andreas Stabno (Was: KC Masterpieces)
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) For the record, this is not true. The people you see posting using handles are *not* violating the terms of service, which say: (do not) Post using a pseudonym, alias, screen-name, handle, alter-ego, meno, or any other type of (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Linking to LUGNET image files?
|
|
[reposted with typo corrections] (...) If it's from the Partsref, any direct image links to the GIFs are OK (and I think it specifically says that it's OK there and shows how to write the URL). If it's from the sets database, there's a mechanism in (...) (24 years ago, 17-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Linking to LUGNET image files?
|
|
G'day Suzanne & Todd, This has probably been asked a million times. I couldn't find any info in the T.O.S. about it. Anyhow, is it okay to link to images on LUGNET, specifically from the sets database, on another website? At present this would be (...) (24 years ago, 17-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | John -- please reply (was: Re: Concerns with Racial Attitudes and Lego)
|
|
(...) John, I tried writing you a reply by e-mail and it bounced: ===...=== ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <ig88888888@stlnet.com> ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to mail.postnet.com.: (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: straying off-topic & marmites (was: Re: the best laid plans of mice and men)
|
|
(...) These things always seem to blow up when someone exercises "vigilante justice" (I haven't followed through 100% of this particular instance to say that this one is a case of "vigilante justice" but I'm speaking from a general viewpoint). What (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: straying off-topic & marmites (was: Re: the best laid plans of mice and men)
|
|
(...) I did not mean ridicule anyone or anything. I feel like ridiculing someone right now, but I am too busy... Scott A (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: straying off-topic & marmites (was: Re: the best laid plans of mice and men)
|
|
(...) This is a key point - I think Todd covered it. Rules do exist, and they should be respected. However, enforcing them in a "jobs worth" manner just alienates everyone. If we all sifted through each and every post and winged about infractions at (...) (24 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: straying off-topic & marmites (was: Re: the best laid plans of mice and men)
|
|
Lorbaat wrote: ..... (...) Is there any possibility that the complaint, or the system itself are somehow ridiculous at least a bit (especially when stretched)? Selçuk (24 years ago, 15-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: straying off-topic & marmites (was: Re: the best laid plans of mice and men)
|
|
(...) Eh. I don't know how clearly this came through in my original post, but I really don't think what Scott posted was off-topic enough or sustained enough to complain about. My main point was merely that his reaction was fairly typical of any (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | straying off-topic & marmites (was: Re: the best laid plans of mice and men)
|
|
(...) I don't think Scott named anyone in particular in connection with that label. He may even have been referring to a brief mail that I sent him. (...) I think this is best dropped. I don't think Scott broke any of the T&C, either. The closest (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Want to get free stuff? Electronics, Computers, Software?
|
|
Please don't post this kind of off-topic commercial junk on Lugnet. This goes for Joseph Myers (who posted the same thing on saturday (URL)) too. Not only is it against the terms of service, it's very rude. (...) [url removed] (...) (24 years ago, 29-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
