|
 | | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) Umm. I dunno. If that's the kind of traffic you want to unload, then certainly a lugnet.debate group is the way to go. (...) Oh, ok. Well, then, I am useless to you, because I have no ideas. :D lugnet.not-a-straight-sale is unweildly. I (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|  
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) To the best of my knowledge, yes. LEGO Shop at Home (both online and offline) is still run by Steven Hawco, who started it some 15 years ago. Steven Hawco reports to Brad Justus. (...) No...(more below)... (...) Oh, see, to me "swap" means (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
|
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:3aa34df1.136496...net.com... (...) Hmmm. I tend to think it's generally a good idea, but are people gonna use it? I think you're still gonna get general Lego ranting & raving in .general, but (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) Ahhh--BINGO! Those are *very* *nice* and *short* name components!!! (...) So you're saying?--deleting the super-lower-level metro groups in .loc.au would be (possibly) a step forward but deleting the state-level groups loc.au.xxx would be a (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
|
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) Yea, that is a problem with using "swap", I guess one factor for me in not breaking it down too much is that while a number of offers are clearly auctions, there are just a few which are pretty strictly trades, and everything else is somewhere (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| Interesting ideas. I look forward to the changes coming to Lugnet. Being serious, I think the Rant newsgroup should be .racers. Or something else that clearly implies the rant and upset-at-Lego sentiments immediately. Just a suggestion that likely (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:3aa41e91.189907...net.com... (...) (.loc.au.vic), (...) per (...) think (...) Even (...) yep, basically I think that would work well _with .loc.au_ other countries may vary. (...) in (...) (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) I'm not sure it would be a good idea to add either of these groups. On the surface it seems great...but I see a potential let-down. When I read discussions in Lugnet, it seems to me that positive and negative conversations add to the (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
|
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) Nonononono, nobody would be required to post raving praise to .rave; the rave area would just be safe haven for raving -- a place where you can't (shouldn't) be chastised for saying nice things, or where you can go to always read nice things. (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
|
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) I think that lugnet.debate would be useful for on-topic controversy (eg perennial faves "does Lego encourage violence?", "why are all minifigs yellow?", "how much does juniorisation suck?"). It should be a default skip-filter though, as should (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
|
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) definitely add these three if for no other reason than to give us somewhere to boot people who keep posting this cr*p in our other ng's (...) well, i like monitoring only one ng, buy-sell-trade, but even if split up (which it really should) it (...) (24 years ago, 8-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) Do you mean the kind of cross-org talk that happens in groups like lugnet.org and lugnet.org.xx, or the kind that happens when someone from one org posts in another org's group? I don't see a reason why lugnet.org couldn't and shouldn't still (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
|
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
|
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
|
| |
|
structure, tough, decisions
(score: 6.220)
|
