Subject:
|
Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Mon, 5 Mar 2001 20:52:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1668 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Todd Lehman writes:
> I'm concerned about seeing protracted debates in .general or other places.
> The .general group is (or should be) kept as "sacred" as possible as a
> friendly meeting spot. Well, .build should be even more sacred than
> general, for that matter, but I don't remember seeing debates start in the
> .build area.
Umm. I dunno. If that's the kind of traffic you want to unload, then
certainly a lugnet.debate group is the way to go.
> > Uh. I didn't say that everything else *was* an auction, I just said that
> > everything else *belonged* in auction. Feel free to rename auction in that
> > instance as is appropriate.
>
> I'm sorry, that didn't come out right. What I meant was, if it belonged in
> .auction and it isn't really an auction, then we'd need some other name
> because .auction wouldn't make sense...which is what you just replied. Any
> suggestions?
Oh, ok. Well, then, I am useless to you, because I have no ideas. :D
lugnet.not-a-straight-sale is unweildly.
I suppose you could have lugnet.market.sale (defined as only straight sales),
lugnet.market.auction (with a note saying that for Lugnet purposes, OBOs were
SBAs and belonged here), and lugnet.market.special (or .other, or .freaky or
what have you) for things that don't quite fit (like trades, etc).
But that's about the best I can come up with.
eric
"NNTP administration is hard. Let's go shopping!"
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| Lorbaat wrote in message ... (...) in (...) Any (...) What about market.auction and market.nonauction. I of course would like to see market.auction.Ebay, market auction.nonebay, market.nonauction(sales?), or market.non auction sale.buy trade Rather (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) I think that lugnet.debate would be useful for on-topic controversy (eg perennial faves "does Lego encourage violence?", "why are all minifigs yellow?", "how much does juniorisation suck?"). It should be a default skip-filter though, as should (...) (23 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) I'm concerned about seeing protracted debates in .general or other places. The .general group is (or should be) kept as "sacred" as possible as a friendly meeting spot. Well, .build should be even more sacred than general, for that matter, but (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
