Subject:
|
Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Wed, 7 Mar 2001 02:12:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1683 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Eric Joslin writes:
> > I'm concerned about seeing protracted debates in .general or other places.
> > The .general group is (or should be) kept as "sacred" as possible as a
> > friendly meeting spot. Well, .build should be even more sacred than
> > general, for that matter, but I don't remember seeing debates start in the
> > .build area.
>
> Umm. I dunno. If that's the kind of traffic you want to unload, then
> certainly a lugnet.debate group is the way to go.
I think that lugnet.debate would be useful for on-topic controversy (eg
perennial faves "does Lego encourage violence?", "why are all minifigs
yellow?", "how much does juniorisation suck?"). It should be a default
skip-filter though, as should .rant (like .off-topic and .admin).
--DaveL
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) Umm. I dunno. If that's the kind of traffic you want to unload, then certainly a lugnet.debate group is the way to go. (...) Oh, ok. Well, then, I am useless to you, because I have no ideas. :D lugnet.not-a-straight-sale is unweildly. I (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
