Subject:
|
Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Mar 2001 01:42:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1193 times
|
| |
|
|
--- Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> So, speak your opinions on these:
>
> * Add new group lugnet.rant or lugnet.lego.rant? Why or
> why not?
>
> * Add new group lugnet.rave or lugnet.lego.rave? Why or
> why not?
>
> * Add new group lugnet.debate? Why or why not?
definitely add these three
if for no other reason than to give us somewhere to
boot people who keep posting this cr*p in our other ng's
> * Delete lugnet.market.auction and
> lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade and replace
> these with lugnet.market.forsale, lugnet.market.wanted,
> and lugnet.market
> .swap? Why or why not?
well, i like monitoring only one ng, buy-sell-trade,
but even if split up (which it really should) it wouldn't
be an inconvenience to just monitor .forsale :-)
i have no opionion on any of the other questions.
> I *especially* would like to hear your opinions if you
> haven't weighed in on
> any of these issues before.
>
> Thanks,
> --Todd
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| I'd like to kick off a discussion about the current state of the newsgroup structure here -- missing groups, unnecessary, groups, annoyingly or confusingly named groups, etc. The goal of this discussion is to come away with a list of practical (...) (23 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.announce, lugnet.org, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.loc.us, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.off-topic.debate) !!
|
101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
