Subject:
|
Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Mon, 5 Mar 2001 23:28:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1396 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Ross Crawford writes:
> [...]
> Don't use these much anyway, but maybe .sell, .buy & .swap?
Ahhh--BINGO! Those are *very* *nice* and *short* name components!!!
> Currently we (.loc.au) can't post in the state level groups (.loc.au.vic),
> only in specific city groups (.loc.au.vic.mel) which are pretty much 1 per
> state ATM anyway. And not many people currently post there anyway. I think
> it'd be good to keep the state groups, certainly don't need city level. Even
> if we get our LUGs in the .org hierarchy (below), I think we still need
> state groups in .loc for non-organisation local state stuff.
So you're saying?--deleting the super-lower-level metro groups in .loc.au
would be (possibly) a step forward but deleting the state-level groups
loc.au.xxx would be a step backward?
> Can this be done like a link? Put all the groups in .org.train, but (for
> instance) have a link in .train to .org.train.
A website link, yes, very easily. For example, the .org area currently has
a crosslink to the .trains.org area:
http://news.lugnet.com/org/
and the .trains.org area currently has a crosslink to the .org area:
http://news.lugnet.com/trains/org/
> I think this'd work for general (non-themed) LUGs as well - put them all in
> .org.general (or similar), but have links to the local ones in (eg) .org.au.
> Does this make sense?
Aren't all the general (non-themed) LUGs true LUGs in the normal sense of
the word -- i.e., regional user groups?
> On thinking about this, .org.general would probably become fairly large.
> Maybe they should be in their local .org group (eg .org.au) with links in
> .org.general?
>
> OK maybe we don't need .org.general at all - just throwing some ideas
> around.
Thanks, lots more ideas is good. I wanna keep the names as short as
possible -- so having an .org.general is probably getting too long for
comfort. That's why it's got two-letter ISO country abbreviations now.
> Also, I still think it'd be good to have lugnet.technic.classic 8?)
You mean Expert Builder or non-modern Technic?
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:3aa41e91.189907...net.com... (...) (.loc.au.vic), (...) per (...) think (...) Even (...) yep, basically I think that would work well _with .loc.au_ other countries may vary. (...) in (...) (...) (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:3aa34df1.136496...net.com... (...) Hmmm. I tend to think it's generally a good idea, but are people gonna use it? I think you're still gonna get general Lego ranting & raving in .general, but (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
