 | | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
Congrats on the new positions. eric (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
(...) Welcome and congrats. For some of us folks who are a little rusty on our LUGNET history, maybe introductions/backgrounds from Steve, Dan, and Jennifer might be nice... what do you say, guys? Again, congrats! - Steve (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
I think that's on a to-do list somewhere. :) Jennifer (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) I think that there is a distinction, however small, between JAL's post and Matt's post. I don't want to get in to that though - I don't feel that it's constructive. The thing about Matt's post that I find offensive is the subject line. A (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) The good news is you're not bitter about it. :-) Why don't we move on... Jude (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
Does this mean we may see links to Peeron inventories in the Lugnet Database in the near future? :) (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) It's hard to respond to a fortune cookie, but if you mean that this path leads away from past mistakes, I have a question for you: Is Jesse Alan Long still banned? I would love to hear that his posting ability was re-instated, and that Lugnet (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) I'm going to go out on a limb and guess you didn't bother to actually read the thread I pointed to. eric (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) Alright, I didn't want to jump into this one to continue a thread with a seemingly offensive title (which is worse than strting it, IMHO), but this is a bit much. Frustration over what Matt thought he saw happening was perfectly justified. I (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP![snip]
|
|
(...) My path leads forward. Please don't trip me. -Suzanne Rich LUGNET Admin (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) Perhaps, then, it is time to ban him. A little refresher reading for everyone: (URL) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) Words are less important than the way in which they are used: "...LEGO sucks for bending over and letting the Maori ream them like this..." isn't particularly nice language. And not "giving a rat's @$$" about a culture isn't very nice either. (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) I (...) now (...) standard (...) argue (...) the (...) unfortunatly, creating a "standard" like that is a very hard (if not impossible) thing to do. For instance, saying "This set is crap" is very very different (at least in my mind) from (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET Admins
|
|
Suz, May I commend you on a terrific decision. Dan actually already contacted me to get the LUGMAP updated which was a long time in comming and its already done!! You could not have picked 3 more upstanding members of the community! I look forward (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:200110311220.f9...ron.com... (...) My concern in this paragraph is some inconsistency I'm perceiving. Where I recall her not being concerned about this [particular word] before, but now it appears (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
(...) post, (...) exactly. (...) claiming (...) find (...) I really don't think that LUGNET should have as low standards as TV does. but that's besides the point. I think if Suz asked it to be toned down, that's the end of the story - why argue with (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
|
"LUGNET Admin" <suz@lugnet.com> wrote in message news:GM12pn.H5B@lugnet.com... (...) Uhh? With all due respect, I'm not quite following. Reading Matt's post, the only words I see in there are 'crap,' 'suck,' and a numerical representation for a (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: **Auczilla domain has been hijacked for adult content**
|
|
(...) Since you brought it back up, lugnet.org *IS* registered to Todd/Suzanne (same address at WHOIS). However, lugnet.net is registered with the *EXTREMELY* evil Name Zero. If you need to register a domain, but can't afford to pay alot, DON'T GO (...) (23 years ago, 29-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: **Auczilla domain has been hijacked for adult content**
|
|
(...) I am working on fixing this... Voyager lost my space and I have to restore it. It's due for a revamp and I was holding off on that revamp till I had time but I forgot how extensively it's linked. So I will put it back as is... some of the (...) (23 years ago, 29-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: **Auczilla domain has been hijacked for adult content**
|
|
(...) lugnet.org and lugnet.net are not currently in use or registered by anyone. It does appear that both are held by reputable web hosting firms at this time. . (23 years ago, 29-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
