 | | Re: . market for HTML?
|
|
(...) Well, I'm not in the NNTP crowd, but I still think allowing HTML in posts would be a Bad Thing (even just in .market). I suppose the only thing I could see doing would be allowing FTX pages to be "posted" since they're less likely to break (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: eBay's Auction for America
|
|
Scott, you have been asked, twice, to keep this topic in .debate yet you repeatedly redirect it back to lego.direct. How rude. The lego.direct newsgroup is for direct communication, not prolonged discussion. You are in violation of the charter for (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: . market for HTML?
|
|
"David Lukens" <dml6@po.cwru.edu> wrote in message news:3BCAD925.305070...wru.edu... (...) buyers (...) for a (...) all (...) .market (...) Same here. I'm anti-HTML email too. (o-t: anyone know how to filter out HTML email in Outlook? Then again, I (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing BricksWest™ 2002 - The West Coast LEGO® Fan Event
|
|
(...) Awesome news. Suggest that an events.brickswest be set up, just as an events.brickfest was... something tells me there is going to be a fair bit of discussion (some along the lines of Tim provoking a Matt-toot of his horn, of course all in (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.events, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: . market for HTML?
|
|
(...) It was not a call for a vote, just a suggestion. Scott A (23 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: . market for HTML?
|
|
(...) This is a NNTP feed. I do not enjoy it when people mistake a news post for a web page (or IE document, but that is another rant). If people want to do all the glitz, let them make a webpage somewhere and post the link into .market My vote is (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: . market for HTML?
|
|
no, if so they have have a page for that and post the link here. This will be useful as it doesn't take more time/bandwith here, and the page remains.... Sonnich Scott A <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:GL71oq.MHM@lugnet.com... (...) (...) (23 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: . market for HTML?
|
|
(...) I agree with Chris, not sure I see how turning the market group into a Flashfest helps anyone. The links are there (in well crafted posts), and those interested can click them to learn more. But those just skimming should not pay the heavy (...) (23 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: . market for HTML?
|
|
(...) In what way would the use of HTML help either the buyers or the sellers? You can readily put links in straight text, and browser-based newsreaders will notice them and allow direct clicking on them. Opening up any group to HTML only opens them (...) (23 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | . market for HTML?
|
|
Most of the threads started in the .market groups are basically advertsiments. Is it time we allowed HTML posts in this group to help buyers *&* sellers? Or are the text only NTTP crowd holding up progress! Scott A (23 years ago, 14-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.brickshops)
|
| |
| | Link update request
|
|
Could someone revise the RcxCC version 3.2 link on the lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc page to something like the following: <a href="(URL) Bricx Command Center (formerly known as RcxCC v3.2) </a> Thanks. John Hansen (23 years ago, 12-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW Featured Item at the Yellow Castle Marketplace (week of Oct 8)
|
|
(...) Maybe so but that's not what I am currently advocating. And it's not how the charter reads. Once you open a charter discussion, you are open to all charter change suggestions, even ones that take the charter in the opposite direction from your (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW Featured Item at the Yellow Castle Marketplace (week of Oct 8)
|
|
(...) But I thought the whole reason the .brickshops subgroup was created was to eliminate from .bst all of the post like "My Brickbay shop has new parts" or "My Brickbay shop is 10% off" plus all of the discussion posts like you want in (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW Featured Item at the Yellow Castle Marketplace (week of Oct 8)
|
|
(...) No, that is not correct. Perhaps I didn't post my mod very clearly ("straight sale" gets expanded explicitly to include third party shops and Cary's prohibition against them is struck) but my intent is that BST, and not .brickshops, is the (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW Featured Item at the Yellow Castle Marketplace (week of Oct 8)
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) So if I am selling a set on my site, I can't post to .bst by both of your modified charters, right? (...) As I read it, my post would be correct under Cary's modified charter, but not under Larry's. Larry's seems to only allow (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW Featured Item at the Yellow Castle Marketplace (week of Oct 8)
|
|
(...) Me too and proud of it. Excessively so, some would say, witness the recent kerfluffe around posting buildings in trains.org... (...) Me too. (...) I think a charter clarification is a great idea as well (and while we're at it maybe we could (...) (23 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: NEW Featured Item at the Yellow Castle Marketplace (week of Oct 8)
|
|
OK, I admit it. I'm a compartmentalized dork. I would prefer messages like this (see below) to appear in one group. Yet, reading the charters for all three groups, there's nothing that directs Ben to choose one group over the other two, so he posts (...) (23 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with full screen pop-up window for set pictures.
|
|
(...) nod, you're right - in the java code that pops up the window, it specifies "scrollbars=0" which disables the scrollbars on the new window. Todd, perhaps this should be changed? as a workaround, you can either disable javascript, or right click (...) (23 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Problems with full screen pop-up window for set pictures.
|
|
Yeah, sorry about that, my screen is 1600x1200 - so when I size a picture for 800 on the longest edge, it's comparatively small on my screen... I'll try to keep it to a minimum - I was a little anxious to get a better picture up - than the catalog (...) (23 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Problems with full screen pop-up window for set pictures.
|
|
When I try to view a set such as (URL) I find that the window is too big for my 800x600 screen I normally use here and have to go to 1024x768 to see the whole picture. There are also no scroll bars so I can scroll the picture around. I play games a (...) (23 years ago, 30-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
