Subject:
|
Re: It is time to ban JAL.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 6 Aug 2001 18:29:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
659 times
|
| |
|
|
Just a small FYI:
In lugnet.admin.general, Eric Joslin writes:
> "Darth Joules" (who needs to re-read the "real life name" portion of the ToS,
> as well)
> http://news.lugnet.com/castle/?n=10191
Both Mike Timm and I pointed this out to him and he changed this quickly enough:
http://news.lugnet.com/castle/?n=10212
> But given your talk above about it being "ethically lax" of you to "let it
> slide" when someone posts, I was shocked to find that you are one of Lugnet's
> biggest pottymouths. I find your habitual commisions of the same ToS >violation to be FAR MORE offensive than Jessie's.
Well, I don't. Witness what Stephen mentioned about his daughter.
(http://news.lugnet.com/people/?n=2518) I was outraged to hear this. I know
7 year olds who throw that three letter word around in class - heck, they
heard it in "Shrek" which is a children's movie. But the words Jesse used
are waaaaay more offensive in my book, don't know about yours.
-Shiri
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: It is time to ban JAL.
|
| (...) No, there isn't. Both have exactly the same effect- obsceneties in a Lugnet post, violating the ToS. Like I said, I understand that (and understand why) Jessie is unpopular, but banning him from Lugnet for something that other people have done (...) (23 years ago, 6-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
30 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
