Subject:
|
Re: It is time to ban JAL.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 6 Aug 2001 16:03:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
509 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Joel Kuester writes:
> If you observe this flagrant breaking of the TOS:
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/people/?n=2508
>
> you will see he has no reguard for the Lugnet community or the wishes of the
> administration to keep profanity off the boards.
Many people have violated this particular ToS and not been banned.
In the past, folks who have posted obscenities (and been called on it,
frequently they aren't) have simply been made to understand that NO posting of
profanities is allowed, even as an "example", and asked to promise not to do it
again.
I know Jessie isn't popular, but that's no reason to treat him differently than
anyone else.
eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: It is time to ban JAL.
|
| (...) Just a note here - Frequently, mild obscenity is let slide by because whenever someone calls the abuser on it, it pretty much invariably turns into a huge fight. Slippery slope? Yup. Ethically lax of me (and others) to let it slide? You (...) (23 years ago, 6-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | It is time to ban JAL.
|
| Hello, I have been reading a lot of the posts from Jesse Alan Long, and paying attention to the arguments going on there since they started. I have posted very rarely in response to him, mainly because I feel it has gone on far too long, as most (...) (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
30 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
