To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 9410
9409  |  9411
Subject: 
Re: It is time to ban JAL from Lugnet.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Sun, 5 Aug 2001 21:14:38 GMT
Viewed: 
3244 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Joel Kuester writes:
> In lugnet.people, Jesse Alan Long writes:
> > I believe that netiquette, as
> > with etiquette, is meant to make people feel inferior to other people and is
> > useless, trivial, banal, and above all, hurtful to other people.  whatever
> > happened to just plain and simple respect of other people?
> > 
> > A good EXAMPLE (say it with me, EX-AM-PLE) is that I never started a
> > sentence with, "You sorry son of a *****, *******, ****** ******* *******!"
> > 
> > The sentence was showing how rude Tim was being with me in the letter,
> > Geordan, when he said some other choice words to me.  I erased the e-mails
> > because I simply got tired of Tim being rude to me.
> > 
> > I was trying to point OUT a rule of netiquette, not trying to violate a rule
> > of netiquette OR a rule of Lugnet.  Mladen and other people will simply
> > flame me act like cavemen until they croak from the planet Earth.
> 
> this is the type of twisting of words that is common from JAL.  This is
> exactly why diplomacy does not work.  We have tried being nice, and he isn't
> stopping.
> 
> 
> > People will keep misinterpreting me because they believe that I am an
> > ignoramous that is incapable of being of any worth to Lugnet.
> 
> JAL has only argued more when we practically begged him to share his MOCs
> with us.  There is only one way to interpret him.  Ignore his twisted logic,
> and pay attention to his actions here on Lugnet.  Ban him now please.
> 
> > People hate
> > me and will not accept any apologies from me and they will not change their
> > ways because they are dead set against being right in their own minds.
> > Maybe they will send some people to make me be quiet permanently if they
> > have enough money.
> 
> It is hard to follow because of his odd writing style, but he is making the
> accusation that someone here on Lugnet will actually hire a hitman to take
> him out.  This is ridiculous and not the reaction of a stable person (as he
> himself has stated previous RE: his mental state)
> 
> http://news.lugnet.com/space/?n=10272
> 
> 
> > Tim violated the rule of netiquette far before me and if anyone wants to
> > argue, maybe we can send this to Suzanne or some other person, perhaps a
> > legal mediator, or, if it comes down to no other alternative, a court room.
> 
> Tim had already admitted to using a swear word, but it must be noted that he
> had the common sense to personally email it to you, not post it on a public
> Lugnet board where children will read it for years to come!
> 
> 
> > P.S.  Geordan, I was not trying to say those words as a flame and I was not
> > simply trying to say them to say those words, I said them because I wanted
> > to show Tim that he did not need to put those words into a letter.
> 
> It doesn't matter that Jesse is claiming that he was using those words as an
> example, he used those words.  Its that simple.  They don't belong on Lugnet
> and neither does HE.
> 
> cheers!
> Joel K

What can I do to say I am sorry if I have violated three different areas of
your rules?  I did not mean to violate the rule about profanity but even so,
rules have been broken by other people and I believe that there may be some
bias on Lugnet and even so, the laws of Massachusetts do not apply to this
state.

Jesse Long



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: It is time to ban JAL from Lugnet.
 
"Jesse Alan Long" <joyous4god2@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GHM5oE.KCH@lugnet.com... <snip> (...) areas of (...) even so, (...) be some (...) to this (...) This has nothing to do with the laws of Mass. or Tenn. LUGNET is a privately owned (...) (25 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: It is time to ban JAL from Lugnet.
 
(...) this is the type of twisting of words that is common from JAL. This is exactly why diplomacy does not work. We have tried being nice, and he isn't stopping. (...) JAL has only argued more when we practically begged him to share his MOCs with (...) (25 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.general, lugnet.people)

30 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR