 | | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) If it's a straight sale, then .market.buy-sell-trade; if it's an auction (i.e., soliciting progressively higher bids from earlier bids), then market.auction, if you're a retailer (e.g., BusyBee, TRU, Target, S@H, etc.) or you're posting (...) (25 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) initial (...) incorporated. (...) I don't know, but DYA got reprimanded for posting to BST. I thought that "real" stores weren't suppose to post in BST. Maybe Todd needs to update the BST descriptions. (...) (25 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) Hmm, good question. I'm not Todd, but I'd be inclined to set the (fuzzy) line at the (indistinct) top edge of cottage industry. How's that for precision? (...) It's a difference of degree, technically, but I'd call it kind, at least for Lugnet (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) Thanks for that clarification, Rose, but now you got me wondering, do Guild of Bricksmiths announcements (of straight sale stuff, not stuff like initial unit auctions, which get announced in .auctions like all other auctions) belong in (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
Please read the group discussions before you post such rudely written posts. Note Buy-Sale-Trade; "Community trading post, items wanted, items for straight sale (no auctions), experiences, market analysis, etc." With the emphasis on community (or (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) My mistake. It didn't show up on my newsreader, but it shows on the web interface. ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) ... (...) Mark S., I thought it was OK as long as the X-Real-Life-Name identifies you. If I look at the full headers for his post, I see: X-Real-Life-Name: Mark Papenfuss /Eric McC/ (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
mfuss903 wrote in message ... <a great deal of stuff...> Just to clarify, my message asking whether Jake's post was appropriate in .announce was directed ONLY to lugnet.admin.general, not to lego.direct, and the admin posts don't appear on the main (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Fix for a broken link
|
|
Todd, In the (URL) page their is a link to Matt's Track Designer. The link to this was changed when I took over the hosting of The Train Depot. The new link is (URL) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) For us AFOLs, it was an incredibly nice thing to do. And for LD, it's a nice way to gather a data point on our buying power. It's a win-win. But... (...) Actually, it doesn't really belong in the main .announce group -- it was an unsolicited (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
