 | | Re: Set list woes...
|
|
(...) I've gotten requests (no demands, so far) several times... I think it's because I'm the first (or close to the first) listed for most sets I'm in. I generally reply with about the same level of politeness as they gave me, and tell them I'm not (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Set list woes...
|
|
"Christopher Tracey" <ctracey@envirolink.org> wrote in message news:3A6CAC91.C9CBC5...ink.org... (...) demands!) from people reading my set lists on my member page to sell (...) trade. (...) done about it? Should I even care? (...) I haven't (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Set list woes...
|
|
I have noticed I seem to be getting more and more requests (and even sometimes demands!) from people reading my set lists on my member page to sell them sets that are clearly listed as ones I own and not ones I am willing to trade. Are other people (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
|
(...) You know what, I think you might be right. That may well be the "official signature" but I can't say for sure as I don't think it's codified somewhere easy to find. Happy to stand corrected, though, if someone knows differently. ++Lar (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
|
(...) I agree. (...) At times there are formal "Todd & Suz" type posts. I may be wrong, but I think these are always announcements? Scott A (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
|
Whoops, typo: Fix this: Is he claiming that's the view of the membership as a whole? It certainly isn't. I'm pretty sure it is, but clarity is essential. to read: Is he claiming that's the view of the membership as a whole? It certainly isn't. I'm (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Not at all a pact with the devil...
|
|
(...) And why shouldn't I have the right to point out irrational anti MS bias? Especially when it's posted in a non useful way, as I said. Todd does have a special responsibility to keep the line between his private persona and his public one (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 'My recent LUGNET Posts' idea
|
|
"Shiri Dori" <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:G7JFp5.9sE@lugnet.com... (...) A bit confused with this statement... (...) No, it wouldn't. Member benefits would still be the same, just when you signed up to post, you would get a member (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 'My recent LUGNET Posts' idea
|
|
(...) Yeah, there's similar-names problems too, like Mark Nelson and Marc Nelson, Jr. (which confused me at first until I met one of them in person). -Shiri. (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Weird thing I just noticed
|
|
(...) The newsgroup doesn't exist, but quick check shows that the articles *are* still accessible - from here: (URL) www.- prefix instead of news.- prefix.) So Todd simply never moved the articles to news.lugnet.com . Interesting. That makes me (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 'My recent LUGNET Posts' idea
|
|
(...) When I say "a large percentage" above, I mean that roughly, say, 80% are crystal clear match-ups. That leaves, say, 20% which aren't, and should be checked by hand. As there are 5200 registered 'From:' lines and 850 members, we're talking (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 'My recent LUGNET Posts' idea
|
|
(...) To me, too - cool idea. And I can definitely see usefulness, finding your own posts, finding people's pages without multiple searches, etc. (...) Yeah... After all, how many discrepancies do you forsee/approximate within less than 1000 people? (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Weird thing I just noticed
|
|
(...) This has been a problem ever since the first search function back in 1998, and I'm sorry for all the confusion it has caused when articles labeled "Canceled" show up in search results. In a feverish moment of clarity the other night, I thought (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 'My recent LUGNET Posts' idea
|
|
(...) Sounds good. (...) Good idea there, but - (...) If only a few need to be matched by hand, then why not take that approach and the rest by hand may not need to be matched? Are you going to take the approach we discussed - assigning EVEYRONE a (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 'My recent LUGNET Posts' idea
|
|
(...) It would be a preprequisite, yes, since the association table which would map 'From:' lines to member id's (and vice-versa) would make the rest much simpler. Once that's done (and I haven't begun to attack the problem yet but am becoming (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: About getting on the Mecha Link/Resources list....
|
|
(...) put it up for me. HTH ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin (25 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Scheduled downtime 18 Jan 2001 for memory upgrade
|
|
(...) We all appreciate the effort and work that has gone into Lugnet, and our lives may well have been changed after visiting it. I thank you for your hard work, dedication, and time that you have spent on all of us. THANKS TODD! Now go see a (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Scheduled downtime 18 Jan 2001 for memory upgrade
|
|
(...) <grabs phone> *beep boop beep beep boop* Todd: mmrruuh? Mark: Hello, can I speak to Mr. Seymour Butts? Todd: Wh-huh? Mark: *cackle* <hangs up> ;^D ~Mark "Muffin Head" Sandlin -- Mark's Lego(R) Creations (URL) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Scheduled downtime 18 Jan 2001 for memory upgrade
|
|
(...) Todd, the system here is more reliable than my office network. I think we can all appreciate your hard work. I certainly do, my hat's off to you. (...) Geez, get some rest. I think we'll all live. (Although I did feel a little light-headed (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Scheduled downtime 18 Jan 2001 for memory upgrade
|
|
(...) The memory upgrade is now complete -- although it wasn't 100% successful. The system's motherboard was reluctant to recognize any DIMMs in the 3rd slot, meaning we failed get to 768 MB and we are stuck with only 512 MB. It may be a faulty (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.announce)
|
