| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Edward Sanburn writes:
> > > I think the bad items in debate are worse than the good, if any, it
> > > generates.
> > I hope that Todd and Suz continue to disagree.
>
> About what?
The way it's written one could almost read it as he hopes that you two have
a lot of fights with each other, rather a mean thing to wish so close to
Winter Solstice festival, don't you think? :-) So I'm doubting *that* is
what he meant.
Presumably, then, that you both disagree with Scott about the value of
.debate (and hence, that you would leave it in place rather than abolish it,
which some people are calling for....). I'm almost certain that is what
Chris meant, but of course I'm speculating.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Uselessness of .debate
|
| (...) Ah, Larry, always throwing a few snipes in to Christianity, huh? I expected nothing less, that's all right. (...) Folks, all I responded to was Frank Filz (SP?) discussion about debate, and according to what he thought, I agreed with him. I (...) (24 years ago, 23-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
90 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
