To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 7920 (-20)
  Re: Lugnet Membership - Idea !!!
 
(...) Hi! (...) You betcha. I can remember a few particularly nasty ones, and I know people can often be irrational when it comes to things like that.... (...) Well, not a newsgroup per se, but a registration system. Take a look at the new set (...) (26 years ago, 13-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.theory)
 
  Re: hackin the faq
 
I'm plugging along with this project; I'm a little surprised that I've generated no feedback. To be inspired/enraged, take a look at this sample entry -- it may not be what you expect: (URL) what I'm doing: - Iterating through the FAQ entries that (...) (26 years ago, 13-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq) ! 
 
  Re: Lugnet Membership - Idea !!!
 
(...) Joe (...) think... (...) I think the eBay facility of allowing you to respond to feedback from others is good - if you get negative feedback, and you don't think it's deserved, you can reply to it. Seems to work well. ROSCO (26 years ago, 13-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.theory)
 
  Re: Lugnet Membership - Idea !!!
 
(...) There all very nice in person (I'm sure) but they can get nasty sometimes when defending their beliefs (or otherwise just flaming). Yes, there have been such debates. It still stings sometimes to think back to those, even to me (I usually try (...) (26 years ago, 13-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.theory)
 
  Re: Lugnet Membership - Idea !!!
 
Hi ! (...) l.o-t.debate) (...) Were there souch a debates in the past ? I guess that all the lugnet members (and those who'd become members in future) are nice people .... (...) ... I guess that would mean whole new newsgroup I don't know it Todd (...) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.theory)
 
  Re: Another suggestion
 
(...) You probably have the real cookie -- lableled "NEWSPOST" in your cookies file. --Todd (26 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  New link for the .loc.us.wa
 
Todd- Could you add a link on the .loc.us.wa web page to the .org.us.sealug and the other way as well? I just want people to easily find sealug postings when they are in the .wa. In fact, it would be great if there was a standard way of linking an (...) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Another suggestion
 
(...) appropriate (...) Is that necessary? I've never had to put my name & e-mail address in when posting - it's always there already. How did I manage to pull that off? James (26 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Another suggestion
 
(...) appropriate (...) Works great. Thanks, Todd. Doesn't seem too horendously difficult 8?) Only time I use the web form is when I'm on site, a lot of places stop NNTP at the firewall 8?( Regards, ROSCO (26 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Another suggestion
 
(...) Yes, it can. It's not very nice & easy to set up, but here's how you do it: 1. Sign in - (URL) Fill out the new setup form - (URL) This saves your info in a "virtual cookie" in your member record on the server, rather than a dedicated cookie. (...) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Set Links (was Re: "Buy The Brick")
 
(...) oh, it's been around for a while... (look at my sig :) also, try <set:8880 Cool set> too! (type < set : 8880 more text here, and a '>' ) :) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Set Links (was Re: "Buy The Brick")
 
(...) Cute trick. Can we all do that, or is that a SysAdmin perk? :-) SRC (26 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Lugnet Membership - Idea !!!
 
Hi All ! I am becoming Lugnet member soon (I sent the money to Todd and I'm waiting) :-)) !!! Since I know that all Lugnet members are buying/selling /trading Lego among themselves (and the other people (non-members) I think it would be good idea if (...) (26 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: FTX example source
 
(...) Not as one page, but you can get at the raw FTX code by appending '.ftx'[1] to the end of each page and looking at them one by one, for example: (3 URLs) etc. --Todd [1] or using index.ftx in the case of a trailing slash (26 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  FTX example source
 
Would it be possible to publish the FTX source to (URL) (which really means the source to all of the components, not just the transclusion source)? It's a pretty good guide, but a few things that appear doable don't appear to be written up anywhere. (...) (26 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: advanced search options?
 
(...) Here's the best answer I can give for now: (URL) How do I tell the search function to return only those posts (...) There isn't a way to search that way. These aren't captured by the current indexer. --Todd (26 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
 
(...) Benjamin may not have control over what mailer his employer uses, but he certainly has control over whether or not his messages appear threaded. If he posts using software that works correctly, his messages will appear threaded. If he posts (...) (26 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 
  Re: Incorrect group posting [was RE: cartoonnetwork.com is having an online contest]
 
Now hold up a sec! Whilst I agree with Todd, berating Benjamin over something he has no control over won't actually accomplish anything. He has stated, previously, that he has no control over what the server admins do on their machines, and I (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: hackin the faq
 
And as the Oops page notes, I really meant: (URL) Clark" <cary@corp.nospamwebtv.net> wrote in message news:G28Jsz.BFu@lugnet.com... (...) question, (...) The (...) on (...) for (...) is (...) made (...) transclusion[3] (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq)
 
  hackin the faq
 
I've spent a few moments paying around with the LUGNET FAQ in FTX. Starting with (URL) (the batch that Jeremy Sproat created some time ago) I've put a whopping total of three of them here: (URL) tried to preserve the original FAQ entries content, (...) (26 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR