 | | Delete Message
|
|
Todd, Please delete message: (URL) how does one delete their own message? -John (URL) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
(...) Compared to Usenet, it's a pretty friendly place, actually. I'm not saying that it couldn't be better, of course. (...) [above lines compressed into one] (...) Wait a sec -- in a recent huge flamefest, wasn't it widely held that age has (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new LUGNET homepage
|
|
Hi Todd and Suzanne, I like the look and "feel" of the new homepage. It is very concise and professional looking. PS The "Terms of Use" link on the page before posting is broken. Rick (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Announcing new LUGNET homepage
|
|
We are pleased to announce a new LUGNET homepage: (URL) hope that you find it refreshing and that new visitors will find it friendly and inviting. If you miss the old homepage, simply look for it at its new location: (URL) thanks to everyone who (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.admin.general) !!
|
| |
| | Delete message?
|
|
Ii apologize if I am doing the wrong thing by posting this here, but could this message be deleted? (URL) from me, and I decided to change the message a bit after I hit the submit button. I hit STOP, but it loaded anyways. Again, I apologize for (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: defining proper content
|
|
"Michael Perri" <zerog270@aol.com> wrote in message news:FzBK0r.462@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) read (...) they (...) please (...) tough (...) they (...) racial (...) about (...) what (...) I've noticed, and so has everyone else I've spoken with, (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | defining proper content
|
|
I am very new to this part of lugnet but I have found a small problem that has received my attention. Anytime I know someone that has found a problem all that I will ask is give a possible solution with it. I wonder if this might be one of those (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) OK, that makes sense. It's only accessing one server there once the image is cached, and then it gives you a large image file. (...) That's totally bizarre too. Another redirection script on a completely different site, presumably doing (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) the first time it was this fast. Multiple times didn't improve the speed at all. (...) the delay. I didn't get a delay with mimg.cgi, (the first link) though. By the way, how did you get those long urls to not split across lines? -- David (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) I think it's specifically the multiple ":" characters. RFC 1738 mentions ":" as a reserved character -- that is, when it occurs in the scheme-specific part of a URL (URLs being <scheme>:<scheme-spe...fic-part>, of course) it should *only* be (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) A-HA! OK, we're getting closer! Could you try the links contained in this article -- (URL) the last indented one which bounces to www.yahoo.com)? If that shows no delay for you under MSIE, then it's probably a good bet that the multiple (URL) (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) Consistent across platforms using both IE 5.01 and IE 5.5. I did notice that using Navigator 4.08 on NT 4 showed now delay at all. So this is at least partially a problem with IE, which is not much of a surprise, but then again, IE is the only (...) (26 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) OK, good, then this has nothing to do with jump.cgi per se (not that I thought it did, but it's better to be sure just in case). You're seeing the same thing from a different redirector. (The display.cgi script simply picks apart the ng name (...) (26 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) I just tried this with IE 5.5 on Win95. No delays. (This is from home.) (26 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) Can't help you there, I only have MSIE. (...) I did a screen capture of #2; you'll find it located temporarily at (URL) if you want. -- David Schilling (26 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Remove double post
|
|
I can't make his second message stay as a "read" post. Help!!!!!! Rose Shiri Dori wrote in message ... (...) duplicates. (...) and (...) (26 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Pruning not good for the trees
|
|
(...) Nah. I'm a cynic (wanna see my ID card?), and I don't think this is the case. Steve (26 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Remove double post
|
|
(...) A link would help him more, I'd bet... (URL)I'm not sure how useful the numbers (if they are unique to (...) They aren't. <smile>... there're 4853s in lugnet.general, .market.shopping, .castle, .trains, etc... -Shiri (26 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Remove double post
|
|
(...) I guess I should say that these messages were posted in .market.shopping and CC to .loc.us.wa. I'm not sure how useful the numbers (if they are unique to all newsgroups or to a particular newsgroup) are without the newsgroups. thanks again. (...) (26 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Remove double post
|
|
Todd- Would you delete one of my double post. Post #4854 or #4853 are duplicates. Thanks -mark (26 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
