 | | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) back (...) I have a 768 DSL connection, and I also get a 4 to 5 second delay. I've seen this a lot recently as well, but haven't mentioned it because I wanted to see what types of links do this. (...) On my computer (with IE 5.5) most of the (...) (26 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) That is soooo weird. The jump.cgi script runs inside of 1/100 second. On ISDN, you really shouldn't notice more than 1/10 extra added time. Anyone else seeing this strange behavior? BTW, what text shows in your browser's status window while (...) (26 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) 128k ISDN. I've tried loading the same page a few times - one with just a single 1.3k image on it and there is a noticable delay between hitting the link then being forwarded to the target URL. The image itself is in my cache and should be (...) (26 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) That's very strange. What kind of net connection are you on? Even on a modem, it shouldn't add more than 1/2 second. The jump.cgi script itself runs in the blink of an eye. --Todd (26 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) If so it was bad when I originally posted the message and bad again when I posted to this thread - some hour or two later. The delay isn't huge, but it is there. (26 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) I don't notice any such delay. Maybe you just hit the server at a bad time? (26 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) Do you find the delay (I've found it to be quite noticable) to be acceptable? It seems to be adding somewhere between 2-3 seconds onto the process of jumping to the intended URL. Dealing with that once isn't much of an issue, but as I noticed (...) (26 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) Todd is a Geek. He likes stats. :) (26 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: How do I delete duplicates?
|
|
(...) Steve, I'm sorry that the preview page is causing you trouble -- it's something I know about and intend to fix by making something that prevents double- posting from the same form. There isn't currently a way to cancel messages via the web (...) (26 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
| |
| | Re: jump.cgi
|
|
(...) No problems that I'm aware of, no. (...) It's to analyze what links get clicked and from where (which page). It's something that can potentially be reported or tabulated for link listings, etc. (see Patrick Delahanty's site listings[1], for (...) (26 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | How do I delete duplicates?
|
|
Argh - I use the preview and page-back function to ensure my msgs. are OK, and TWICE now I've wound up with the same msgs. posted twice. However, I can find no way to delete my message and clean up this error. I'm less concerned that it's occuring (...) (26 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
| |
| | jump.cgi
|
|
Todd, What is the purpose of jump.cgi? Was there any problem with external links that prompted this? Or is is simply to track what links get clikced by who and how often? If that data was useful for LUGNET (i.e. helps you raise money etc.) then I (...) (26 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Memberships- Where to send them?
|
|
(...) Thanks!, It just that from the UK sending payment abroad is not a simple as sending a cheque in the post( Or is it? I seem to remember something about needing to arrange it through my bank?) Anyhow, I need to become a Lugnet member in order to (...) (26 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Mecha Listing
|
|
HI, I was wondering if I could be added to the list of pages in the mecha area, if how can I be added in later? Heres my site address: (URL) Please take a look and tell if im worthy of being on the mecha list. -Later John Aronson (26 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RE: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) You mean set 5220 "Styling pack" as shown in the second catalogue for 2000 in Australia? It will ONLY be available from: (URL) will 5218, 5219, 5221, and 5222, according to the catalogue. [I'll get the scans of these sets up tonight.] This (...) (26 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) One such example would be the Y-Wing+TIE set featuring Darth Vader on the box cover. It was the only source for that figure for over a year until the figure sets came out. The number of Y-Wing set sold would be greatly reduced if the figure (...) (26 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) No such decision yet. The DeCSS case is in progress right now, and those of us who care about freedom of speech and the web in general sure hope it'll come down the other way. In fact, an important question in that case is whether source code (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) You will have to consult an attorney specializing in Intellectual Property or ask LEGO and trust what they say back. (...) It may be and it may not be. Intellectual Property case law is changing every day. Months ago, it was not illegal to (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) Some of us just want to know what _is_ acceptable here, so that we are not subject to arbitrary deletions. For example, if I post the URL of where I have 'the list' (hehehe, making it sound evil!), is that a violation of the LUGNET T&C? How (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) Is anyone else finding this discussion a small pain in the "a postiori"? You guys are now revolving in tighter circles than even Justice Scalia normally attempts. AND arguing in TWO languages about the meaning of a particular word (arguing in (...) (26 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
