| |
>
> Don't like it? Take it to RTL -- it remains useful for some things, as Lugnet
> itself cannot be all things to all Lego fans. And that's a fact too!
Some of us just want to know what _is_ acceptable here, so that we are not
subject to arbitrary deletions.
For example, if I post the URL of where I have 'the list' (hehehe, making it
sound evil!), is that a violation of the LUGNET T&C?
How about if I post that there is a interesting discussion on this issue on
RTL, is that a violation?
_I_ don't know where I would stand with these issues right now, and _I_ want
some clarification.
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) You will have to consult an attorney specializing in Intellectual Property or ask LEGO and trust what they say back. (...) It may be and it may not be. Intellectual Property case law is changing every day. Months ago, it was not illegal to (...) (24 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Is anyone else finding this discussion a small pain in the "a postiori"? You guys are now revolving in tighter circles than even Justice Scalia normally attempts. AND arguing in TWO languages about the meaning of a particular word (arguing in (...) (24 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
176 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
