 | | Re: Pruning not good for the trees
|
|
(...) I understand that you're acting in good faith and make no accusations against you. However, since this information was apparently available to the public before being posted to LUGnet, I have a hard time seeing how it's not editorial. It's (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Pruning not good for the trees
|
|
(...) This is so far from editorial control that light from editorial control takes ten million years just to reach here. The reaons were purely _legal_ and by specific request from TLC. Editorial control would be if TLC requested removal of, say, (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Pruning not good for the trees
|
|
(...) Prolly. But removing the whole thing is "less" control than excising words but leaving the rest. Or so I seem to recall Prodigy's lawyer telling me about 15 years ago when I first started looking into this topic. And "less" control, especially (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Pruning not good for the trees
|
|
(...) I'm pretty sure removing things like this is editorial control, wholesale or not. (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Pruning not good for the trees
|
|
I just went and looked at the 2001 set info tree and with all the cancels, that tree is dust. The tree view for me showed a bunch of disconnected posts with no hierarchy at all. Is that an inevitable outcome of wholesale cancellation or is there a (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) I don't really have a problem with your reasons for canceling the various posts that began this thread. My problem is that TLC seems to be asking you to replace their clothing when *they* are the ones walking about nude! If they have a problem (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) Well, you know, the same exact thing would have happened if LEGO had asked the same thing a year ago. The only difference now is that they're paying attention, so they notice things like this. And they use e-mail, which makes things go faster. (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Double Postings
|
|
I've noticed an increase of identical messages that are posted twice. Todd, Is it possible to do a simple check to see whether the same message has been posted within the last few minutes and then discard the second one? Optimize well, Andreas (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) Yes, I deleted as few messages as possible -- only the ones which contained references to the materials which were asked to be deleted. --Todd (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) Oh, and P.S.: Todd only deleted a lot of the reply messages because the original message was in with the reply, which makes a lot of sense. Most of the replies were mostly "Wow, that's cool" so, personally, I feel Todd did exercise good (...) (26 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) Well said. ~Nick (URL) (26 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) Gotta agree with Eric here. And wow, I guess I either need to spend more time reading various groups again or give up entirely. In fact, I'm a little scared after looking at the little dots view of this thread. Most of what I'm seeing are (...) (26 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Making Lego Movies
|
|
(...) I'm assuming we will eventually get a new group called lugnet.studios or lugnet.movies or something. I hope the charter will include general movie making discussions, as well as LEGO Studios Steven Spielberg MovieMaker Set. Maybe we need a (...) (26 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) LEGO has respectfully requested that the leaked information on this thread be deleted or otherwise removed from view. Since this was a formal request and TLC's privacy rights are in question here, this is a legal issue and I will be deleting (...) (26 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: Color pieces of rebel ship sets
|
|
(...) Oh! Well then, thank you very much for snuffing my dupe. You got it before I even refreshed the message-list display. Steve (26 years ago, 5-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Web interface to LUGNET news moving from www.lugnet.com to news.lugnet.com
|
|
(...) Both work for me Todd! Great job yet again. Thanks. -Nick (26 years ago, 5-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Web interface to LUGNET news moving from www.lugnet.com to news.lugnet.com
|
|
(...) Yes and no -- "yes" in that the main www.lugnet.com homepage will be changing dramatically, and "no" in that the first makeover prototype isn't probably what will replace it, but something else. --Todd (26 years ago, 4-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Web interface to LUGNET news moving from www.lugnet.com to news.lugnet.com
|
|
(...) OK, great! Worked on my Win98+MSIE5 test system too. I'll cut it over to the "real thing." Thanks for your help. --Todd (26 years ago, 4-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Web interface to LUGNET news moving from www.lugnet.com to news.lugnet.com
|
|
(...) Yes, that also works! Thanks. -- David Schilling (26 years ago, 4-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Color pieces of rebel ship sets
|
|
(...) Sorta. There *should* be an automatic thingie, but the better thing would be to avoid it in the first place (99% of the duplicate posts come from the web interface, I think) -- hence the idea about the unique ID in the form. Anyway, if I (...) (26 years ago, 4-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
