| |
> I guess I just have to trust that Todd either got
> permission from all those posters to zap their messages, doesn't need it
> (probably true, according to the tos), and exercised some good judgement in
> this wholesale deletion of a discussion.
Oh, and P.S.: Todd only deleted a lot of the reply messages because the
original message was in with the reply, which makes a lot of sense. Most of
the replies were mostly "Wow, that's cool" so, personally, I feel Todd did
exercise good judgement and complied with TLC fully. I would have done the
same thing.
~Nick
http://members.aol.com/swatlego
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Gotta agree with Eric here. And wow, I guess I either need to spend more time reading various groups again or give up entirely. In fact, I'm a little scared after looking at the little dots view of this thread. Most of what I'm seeing are (...) (26 years ago, 7-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
176 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
