 | | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) I've always equated LSAHS = LEGO Shop At Home Service because of the official name being "Shop At Home Service" as shown on the catalogs that come in themail. (...) Mmm, interesting. What goes in front of .lsah.specials? A (...) (26 years ago, 4-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | (...) Just a quick tangent here since we don't have a .lsahs group yet. Are the LC accessories still $1.50 or are you just listing that as an example? (26 years ago, 4-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | (...) Todd, an idea... IMO, the word "market" says that it's stuff we're selling online, not official retailers, which I'm assuming don't sell here. Even if they did, they could still use market.buy-sell-trade. I guess we're concerned about passing (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Yup -- great! -- that's exactly what it was intended as. (...) Yup -- I agree, that would make a lot of sense (assuming it was done in a friendly and non-spamful way :). (...) Wow, I just looked up "retail" in online Webster's -- it says that (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | | (...) I've always thought that a retailer sells directly to Joe Gritz even if they slap on the word "wholesale", the meaning of which has been slightly widened these days. I do not consider CostCo to be strictly a wholesaler. In cases like that, (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Oops, yes, thanks -- I meant "_discussions_of_ buying and shopping for primarily-brand-new LEGO sets." What you wrote is cool too -- but I'd like to see it be discussions as well, not just pure information dispersal. --Todd (26 years ago, 5-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Oops, sorry. My misunderstanding. (...) Well, that is open to discussion. I don't have a strong opinion on lugnet.market.lsahs.specials or lugnet.shopping.lsahs.specials. (...) Good point. (...) I guess that's what I was suggesting as a (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Deep vs. wide -- do you mean deeper is better than wider? (Is the "Oh, yeah" a point or a counter-point?) I don't have any inherent dislike for deep ng trees as long as the ng names remain: (a) type-able, (b) remember-able, (c) readable, and (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Proper place to post US S@H Phone Specials —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Sometimes. Did someone say "golden mean"? "Oh, yeah" = "I just remembered what I was thinking of when I wrote about it originally." (...) Yes. To all of that. (26 years ago, 5-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
