Subject:
|
Re: LUGNET getting too complex?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 23 Apr 2000 21:47:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
888 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.admin.general, Kevin Salm writes:
>
> Dan Boger wrote in message <38FF7F13.BA000A27@giccs.georgetown.edu>...
> > Matthew Miller wrote:
> > >
> > > I imagine that when Todd gets around to making the web site able to keep
> > > track of which messages you've read, this feature will be available there
> > > too. But I don't think that's going to be available for a while. :(
> >
> > I think it already does that - if you rate a message, it'll appear as
> > rated by you in all the groups it's been crossposted to (with the little
> > red arrow by the rating)... So all you need to do it rate each message
> > you read ;)
Which, if I understand correctly, is no longer available, since you can't rate
"No Opinion" any more.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: LUGNET getting too complex?
|
| Dan Boger wrote in message <38FF7F13.BA000A27@g...wn.edu>... (...) Another alternative for keeping messages marked as READ using web interface is to set the history file setting for a longer amount of time. I have mine in Netscape set at 80 days. I (...) (24 years ago, 23-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
17 Messages in This Thread: ![LUGNET getting too complex? -Michael Hopkins (19-Apr-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: LUGNET getting too complex? -Richard Franks (19-Apr-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: LUGNET getting too complex? -Richard Franks (19-Apr-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: LUGNET getting too complex? -Michael Hopkins (19-Apr-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: LUGNET getting too complex? -Dan Boger (20-Apr-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: LUGNET getting too complex? -Kevin Salm (20-Apr-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: LUGNET getting too complex? -Todd Lehman (20-Apr-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: LUGNET getting too complex? -Kevin Salm (20-Apr-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: LUGNET getting too complex? -Dan Boger (20-Apr-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: LUGNET getting too complex? -Nicholas Allan (21-Apr-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: LUGNET getting too complex? -Steve Bliss (20-Apr-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: LUGNET getting too complex? -Matthew Miller (20-Apr-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: LUGNET getting too complex? -Dan Boger (20-Apr-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: LUGNET getting too complex? -Kevin Salm (23-Apr-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: LUGNET getting too complex? -Matthew Miller (23-Apr-00 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: LUGNET getting too complex? -Steve Bliss (20-Apr-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|