|
In lugnet.robotics, Rob Hendrix writes:
> Todd,
> Now that everyone has been properly schooled of the ins and outs of
> receiving some or all robotics posts (thank you for teaching everyone),
> can I have my robotics.sensors? *down on floor begging*
I would think the support of Michael Gasperi and Brian Stormont would be
important here, since this would be moving a certain amount of traffic down
to a lower level rather than creating new traffic from scratch (where there
is no loss but only potential gain).
Perhaps you could write up a proposal, including a charter, and put it out
for comments/review.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors)
|
| I still can't quite understand why it is so important to get sensors out of the standard listing. Aren't robots 33% sensors and 33% actuators and 33% software (rounded to the nearest 33%)? Confused ... JB ----- Original Message ----- From: Todd (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
30 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|