Subject:
|
Re: Help: Re: review: LEGO '99
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 14:36:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
217 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Miller writes:
> David Schilling <davidNO@SPAMsunteleia.com> wrote:
> > To summarize, though, I don't think it would be too big a deal if there
> > were false matches. The benefit of having this feature would more than
> > make up for the minor inconvenience other times.
>
> But Todd has put so much effort into making LugNET do things The Right Way
> it seems a shame to mar it with such an unelegant solution.
I was thinkin' thumbnails along the bottom or side wouldn't get in the way
too much, maybe, if there were false positives...
--Todd
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Help: Re: review: LEGO '99
|
| (...) Down the side would work, especially as this is a web interface thing - I don't know about other people, but I've got a lot of screen real estate doing nothing in messages... My major concern with that would be loading times. The S@H specials, (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: Help: Re: review: LEGO '99
|
| (...) That's true. I'm also thinking outside of the web interface.... If I have some newsreader which I want to set up to react to set numbers, it'd be nice if they were distinctly identifiable. (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: Help: Re: review: LEGO '99
|
| (...) I was thinking this could be easily done if people used a rail/number (#) sign before the set number. That way, the system finds only numbers after that sign. Just a thought. -Shiri (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
