To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 3661
3660  |  3662
Subject: 
Re: Help: Re: review: LEGO '99
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 16:41:25 GMT
Viewed: 
4263 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Jacob Sparre Andersen writes:
> David Schilling:
> 
> > If some special syntax is used, then it has to be
> > something really simple, otherwise people won't do it.
> 
> Correct.
> 
> > Using either #8880 or <8880> as a way of indicating set
> > numbers would be okay, but anything more and people won't
> > remember it, or won't bother typing it often enough.
> 
> The first one is slightly too general. People do refer to
> part #3001 quite often (but it is mostly other parts that
> are referenced by number).
> 
> > Also, any of these conventions means that older posts
> > won't have the set numbers work as links.
> 
> Seriously. Lugnet has only existed for a year (or is it
> two?). Within a year, it will only be a minor portion of the
> articles, where this is a problem.

I agree.  The fact that the functionality might not be
retroactive for old posts is not a problem.

> > With the set indication methods, (# or <>'s, for example)
> > what should happen if there is no such set?
> 
> Nothing.
> 
> I like the "<set:ID>" better. It can also be extended with
> "<part:ID>" for referring to parts.

True.

Or, the suggested LS#xxxx nomenclature could be modified to handle
parts lookups -- LP#yyyy would produce a hyperlink to LEGO part
such and such.  But I'd be happy to use any (simple) syntax
required to get this feature to work.  Your suggested syntax
is good.

--

jthompson@esker.com    "Float on a river, forever and ever, Emily"



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Help: Re: review: LEGO '99
 
David Schilling: (...) Correct. (...) The first one is slightly too general. People do refer to part #3001 quite often (but it is mostly other parts that are referenced by number). (...) Seriously. Lugnet has only existed for a year (or is it two?). (...) (27 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

17 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR