Subject:
|
Re: Help: Re: review: LEGO '99
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 15 Dec 1999 14:00:01 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm^saynotospam^.org
|
Viewed:
|
768 times
|
| |
|
|
Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk> wrote:
> I like the "<set:ID>" better. It can also be extended with
> "<part:ID>" for referring to parts.
And it does mimic the schema for URLs. ( <URL:http://www.mattdm.org/> )
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Help: Re: review: LEGO '99
|
| David Schilling: (...) Correct. (...) The first one is slightly too general. People do refer to part #3001 quite often (but it is mostly other parts that are referenced by number). (...) Seriously. Lugnet has only existed for a year (or is it two?). (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
