Subject:
|
Re: In support of Larry
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 16:29:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1403 times
|
| |
|
|
> > a) Per 1000 posts, you have had more arguments than anyone on Lugnet.
>
> Do you care to justify that? I expect not!
Personal speculation. I haven't the time or desire to prove my point. If
anyone else deems necessary, then I'll let them count them all. I'm just
saying that you get into more argumentative situations on Lugnet because of
your aggressive and debateful nature. You troll for no apparent reasons
other than stirring conflict. You cross-grain anything anyone ever says and
agree with no one but yourself.
> > b) I recall your willingness to not only flout, but totally disregard the
> > rules and spoof your identity on previous baiting posts. In fact, I
> > think
> > the baiting rule was introduced just because of your repeated misconduct.
>
> I did it once to show it could be done. I was very open about what I was
> doing.
> It was a foolish thing to do; I even apologised IRC. I'm not sure that
> even
> compares to some of the things Larry has done!
Could you be specific in the nature of these accusations towards Larry?
>
> > c) Bricklink rules, or bending of said rules, or anything that doesn't
> > directly affect Lugnet has no place in this conversation.
>
> That is a good point, but it does not answer my point!
What is your point? That you are better than Larry and expect to take his
place as a Lugnet admin?
> > I don't think BL
> > is the perfect selling place, I don't think Larry is a perfect person,
> > and I
> > saw valid points on both sides of that situation, but again, that has no
> > place in this conversation.
>
> How can a person who disregards rules in one situation be trusted to
> enforce
> them in another?
I don't think BL is admined very well, and the many injustices Larry has
suffered at the hands of Dan prove the point nicely. Your assertion that
Larry "causes trouble there" is 180 degrees off the mark, he's the victim,
not the troublemaker.
> [So it looks like your "the pot calling the kettle black" jibe does not
> hold
> water.]
Prove it... Stop trolling for trouble and start making posts that actually
benefit both yourself AND the entire Lugnet community.
Rob
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: In support of Larry
|
| (...) I thought as much. Try to be more constructive. (...) I don't think recounting events here would be particularly constructive. Why don't you ask him? If he does not tell you, drop me an e-mail. (...) My point was that I have not caused a pile (...) (20 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: In support of Larry
|
| (...) Do you care to justify that? I expect not! (...) I did it once to show it could be done. I was very open about what I was doing. It was a foolish thing to do; I even apologised IRC. I'm not sure that even compares to some of the things Larry (...) (20 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
