Subject:
|
Re: In support of Larry
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 14:50:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1199 times
|
| |
|
|
"Scott A" <dr_scott_arthur@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ICw2EC.o06@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.admin.general, Rob Hendrix wrote:
> > > Tim,
> > > With respect, you are being obsequious. Can people not draw any
> > > conclusion
> > > from
> > > the fact that Larry has probably had more spats with more people than
> > > anyone
> > > else on LUGNET? Can they not make a judgment based on his willingness to
> > > flout
> > > the rules? What about all the trouble he has caused in Bricklink in the
> > > past?
> > >
> > > Do people have to look him in the eye to confirm he is his own worst
> > > enemy?
> > >
> > > Scott A
> >
> >
> > Now there's the pot calling the kettle black...
>
> Are you saying that I:
>
> a) have "had more spats with more people than anyone else on LUGNET?"
> b) have shown a "willingness to flout the rules"?
> and
> c) have caused trouble on bricklink?
>
> ...or are you just attacking me rather than answering the points I raise?
>
> Scott A
>
>
> > :P
Had you noticed the ":P" at the end of my post, you would have immediately
realized that I was joking. That being said and having read your baited
reply, I'll just say this:
a) Per 1000 posts, you have had more arguments than anyone on Lugnet.
b) I recall your willingness to not only flout, but totally disregard the
rules and spoof your identity on previous baiting posts. In fact, I think
the baiting rule was introduced just because of your repeated misconduct.
c) Bricklink rules, or bending of said rules, or anything that doesn't
directly affect Lugnet has no place in this conversation. I don't think BL
is the perfect selling place, I don't think Larry is a perfect person, and I
saw valid points on both sides of that situation, but again, that has no
place in this conversation.
Rob
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: In support of Larry
|
| (...) Do you care to justify that? I expect not! (...) I did it once to show it could be done. I was very open about what I was doing. It was a foolish thing to do; I even apologised IRC. I'm not sure that even compares to some of the things Larry (...) (19 years ago, 7-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: In support of Larry
|
| (...) Are you saying that I: a) have "had more spats with more people than anyone else on LUGNET?" b) have shown a "willingness to flout the rules"? and c) have caused trouble on bricklink? ...or are you just attacking me rather than answering the (...) (19 years ago, 5-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
