 | | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
|
(...) Well then, would the Lugnet Admins consider it a personal insult if I was to create a poll: "Do you think Lugnet Admin is a good job match for Larry?" "Yes" "No" "Don't know" "Don't care" ROSCO (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
|
(...) I am referring to this post, where Larry is berating, resorts to name calling, to the point of questioning people's manhood. From where I'm sitting as an Admin, this is crossing the line. (URL) this post: (URL) respect Larry for 12407 (...) If (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
|
(...) It sounds to me like there isnt anything Lar can do to 'cut it' with you. What Lar said is that he is responsible for his actions regardless of any context - including being provoked. I personally am very pleased by Lar's public statement of (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Suspension of Chris Magno and Terry P
|
|
(...) You require is completely unreasonable. Good luck enforcing it. What is required is that people be treated with respect, which is not the same as having respect for them. Again, I will point out that Larry has been extremely disrespectull in (...) (16 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
|
(...) I would also point out that Lar coun't resist mentioning the provocation in his "(URL) apology post>". Sounds too much like "I'm sorry, but it was his fault" which just doesn't cut it with me. ROSCO (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
|
(...) Thank you for your thoughtful responce. For the time being, I respectfully disagree. -Lenny (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
|
(...) Believe me, I understand. My life goal has always been to be a type B person. I'm not there yet. Please note that I suggested that we *all* take a timeout. As much as I love lugnet, I would not volunteer to be an Admin. I do not have the (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Suspension of Chris Magno and Terry P
|
|
(...) It is required that all other members be respected. Those who have volunteered to give their time and efforts to the better good, especially. On a more legalistic note, posts by Admins as Admins (using the @lugnet address) should be considered (...) (16 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
|
(...) Kevin, You may not have ever been in this sort of position - but it is extremely stressful. Todd's legacy of the 'Buddha' responce to everything is something to strive towards, but is difficult to always achieve. Please understand that we are (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
|
(...) Take a deep breath. Go for a walk. (...) I certainly find this paragraph combative. It certainly is name calling, and questioning of manhood. (...) In some ways it is similar. (...) You have my permission to take a break. In fact I recommend (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Suspension of Chris Magno and Terry P
|
|
(...) Is it required? (...) Then I object again. (...) And yet, Admins can insult and berate sarcastically and have no warnings or admonishment of any kind? (...) Kevin (16 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
|
(...) You are in good company! That's exactly why that usage was invented some time in the last couple of centuries. You could also read it as "Oh my gosh" or even "Oh my golly". Gosh and golly (euphemisms for God) were also invented to stop people (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Suspension
|
|
(...) I should note that, in accordance with our given policy, Larry's posting abilities have been revoked for all of Lugnet. The suspension is for 24 hrs beginning right now (9pm EST). -Lenny Hoffman LUGNET Admin Member #1168 (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Suspension
|
|
(...) I formally acknowledge that the LUGNET ToU applies to me as much as it does to anyone else, and that the post referenced (which has been cancelled) contained inappropriate and disrespectful remarks. I further acknowledge the authority of the (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Another Suspension
|
|
Again, following standard Admin policy concerning inappropriate language: Larry Pieniazek has been suspended for 24 hours for (URL) this post>. His posting abilities are limited to the admin heirarchy, as is the usual policy for suspension. -Leonard (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
|
(this is a repost with some inappropriate language and phrasing removed) (...) You posted a post that contained a word that clearly violates the ToU. It matters not whether you quoted it, or what context you used it in, that particular word is one (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | Re: Suspension of Chris Magno and Terry P
|
|
(...) Crass and rude insults *will* be tolerated it seems. I think, the last para of this is (URL) post> is crass, rude and insulting to several users. -snip- (...) Nope. Not by a long shot. Regards Richie Dulin (16 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Suspension of Chris Magno and Terry P
|
|
(...) Not entirely true. Chris (URL) his contest out of respect for Todd - which shows that Chris does not respect Todd's choices in who Todd has elevated to Admin status. (...) It followed the established process for suspensions. An Admin proposed (...) (16 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: wish's
|
|
(...) Yes. Weeks. This has been brewing for weeks, It only piqued in the last few days. But people have been bickering (from both sides) on this topic for weeks. (...) All your words are on the good list, but your tone is clearly provacative. Do you (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
