Subject:
|
Re: lugnet.duplo/toolo
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 27 Mar 1999 14:22:52 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@iwantnospam.ctp.NOMORESPAMcom
|
Viewed:
|
1361 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> In the current list above, BTW, note the (undesirable) duplicity between
> lugnet.lego.system.trains and lugnet.trains. Not sure yet what to do
> about that (or the LEGO MindStorms group for that matter).
Well, IMHO, if you decide to institute these groups using this
prefixing, I'd argue that lulgnet.trains should be renamed to
lugnet.lego.system.trains rather than there being two groups. Ditto for
mindstorms, and for starwars for that matter (which under this naming,
should become lugnet.lego.system.space.starwars). Having two of each
kind of group seems wrong, somehow.
However I'm not sure I support this naming convention. It's unwieldy.
What do the extra prefixes really buy you, after all?
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
FDIC Know your Customer is wounded, thanks to you, but not dead...
See http://www.defendyourprivacy.com for details
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: lugnet.duplo/toolo
|
| (...) It'll mean I will never be able to cross-post using slrn. No way I'm going to try to remember all those x.x.x.x.x.whatevers so I can type them in manually. Not everybody uses pretty little graphical clients with pull-down menus of all the (...) (26 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: lugnet.duplo/toolo
|
| (...) That's what I'm hoping people will say generally. Not too much talk of DUPLO trains in the lugnet.trains group anyway, right? (...) This one is a real challenge because of the gatewayed lego-robotics mailing list and because the current (...) (26 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: lugnet.duplo/toolo
|
| (...) Yup, absolutely! :) (...) I agree. Plus PRIMO and TECHNIC and SCALA and Fabuland and lots of other special-interest areas. I originally had these and many others in the initial newsgroups list last summer, but was talked out of it by several (...) (26 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
